Block-based low latency rate control

ABSTRACT

Block-based, low latency rate control for an encoding system in which a wavelet transform decomposes pixel blocks into subbands stored as subbands in wavelet blocks (WBs) for encoding. Quantization parameters (QPs) for the subbands in each WB are estimated using a method that minimizes wavelet-inverse distortion given a rate bound. For each subband, a rate curve is generated based on an unquantized DCT histogram and bit count statistics for the subband, and a distortion curve is generated based on the unquantized DCT histogram and a distortion estimate for the subband that is estimated using a masked estimator. Once the rate-distortion curves for the subbands are generated, a bisection search may be used to find a point on each curve where the slope is the same for all the curves. The QPs associated with those equally sloped points are the global minimizing QPs for the wavelet block.

PRIORITY INFORMATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.17/031,750, filed Sep. 24, 2020, which claims benefit of priority ofU.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/907,223, filed Sep. 27, 2019,which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

BACKGROUND

Virtual reality (VR) allows users to experience and/or interact with animmersive artificial environment, such that the user feels as if theywere physically in that environment. For example, virtual realitysystems may display stereoscopic scenes to users in order to create anillusion of depth, and a computer may adjust the scene content inreal-time to provide the illusion of the user moving within the scene.When the user views images through a virtual reality system, the usermay thus feel as if they are moving within the scenes from afirst-person point of view. Similarly, mixed reality (MR) combinescomputer generated information (referred to as virtual content) withreal world images or a real world view to augment, or add content to, auser's view of the world, or alternatively combines virtualrepresentations of real world objects with views of a three-dimensional(3D) virtual world. The simulated environments of virtual reality and/orthe mixed environments of mixed reality may thus be utilized to providean interactive user experience for multiple applications.

SUMMARY

Various embodiments of a video encoding system are described that encodehigh-resolution video sources at low latencies for transmission over acommunications link (e.g., a wireless link) to a device for decoding anddisplay. An example application of the video encoding system is invirtual reality (VR) or mixed reality (MR) systems in which video framescontaining virtual content are rendered, encoded, and transmitted by abase station to a device (e.g., a notebook or laptop computer, pad ortablet device, smartphone, or head-mounted device (HMD) such as aheadset, helmet, goggles, or glasses that may be worn by a user) fordecoding and display.

In some embodiments, the video encoding system includes a wavelettransform component that performs a two-level wavelet transform thatdecomposes blocks of pixels (e.g., 128×128 pixel blocks) from a strip ofa frame into multiple different subbands (e.g., seven subbands (LLLL,LLLH, LLHL, LLHH, LH, HL, and HH) represented by sixteen 32×32 subblocks(CTUs) in a wavelet block), followed by a block-based encoder such as anHEVC (high-efficiency video coding, also known as H.265) encoder thatencodes the subbands (i.e., the seven subbands represented in the 16 CTUblocks). The encoded frequency data is sent to a wireless interface thatpacketizes the encoded frequency data and transmits the packets to thereceiving device. On the receiving device, the encoded data isde-packetized and passed through a block-based decoder to recover thesubbands. Wavelet synthesis is then performed on the recovered subbandsto reconstruct the pixel data for display. Note that HEVC encoding maybe lossy, and thus there may be “distortion” when comparing thereconstructed video data to the original video data.

In embodiments, to perform rate control under the strict latency andmemory requirements of a VR/MR system, instead of working over a timeconstant of a strip, frame, or two frames to adjust encoder parameters,the rate control component may determine encoder parameters for eachblock in a frame (e.g., a quantization parameter for each subblock (CTU)in the block) based at least in part on statistics or metrics receivedfrom the encoder pipeline, wireless interface, and complexity analysis.

In some embodiments, rate control statistics for one or more previouslyprocessed blocks may be stored to a memory. Stored statistics forco-located blocks (e.g., quantization parameters for the subblocks inthe blocks) may be used by the rate control component in determiningquantization parameters for a current block being processed in the videoencoding system. In some embodiments, complexity statistics for thecurrent block may be determined and used by the rate control componentto adjust the quantization parameters from a co-located block togenerate the quantization parameters for the current block.

In embodiments of a rate control component as described herein, thequantization parameters for the subblocks in a block may be calculatedglobally to jointly optimize bandwidth usage and the overall displayedquality of the video data after decoder reconstruction and waveletsynthesis is performed on the target device. Embodiments of the ratecontrol component may implement a method for rate allocation between thesubblocks in a block that estimates quantization parameters (QPs) forthe subblocks in a block (e.g., QPs for the 16 CTUs in a wavelet block(WB)) to minimize wavelet-inverse distortion given a rate bound for thewavelet block:

$\begin{matrix}{{\underset{{QP}_{0},{\ldots.{QP}_{15}}}{minimize}{{{W^{- 1}({WB})} - {W^{- 1}H^{- 1}{H({WB})}}}}_{2}^{2}},{{{subject}{to}{\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{15}R_{n}}} \leq R_{wbTarget}}} & (1)\end{matrix}$where W⁻¹ is the inverse wavelet transform, H is the HEVC encoding ofCTU_(n) with QP_(n) for 0<=n<=15, H⁻¹ is the HEVC decoding of encodedCTU_(n) for 0<=n<=15, R_(n) is the number of bits required toHEVC-encode CTU_(n) with QP_(n), and R_(wbTarget) is the target ratebound for the wavelet block.

Embodiments of the rate control component may implement a method toestimate the global minimizing QPs for a wavelet block in which, foreach subblock of the wavelet block (i.e., the 16 CTUs), a curve isgenerated (referred to as a rate-distortion curve) that maps thedistortion and the number of bits (rate) for that CTU. A given point ona rate-distortion curve indicates distortion at a given bit rate for thecorresponding CTU. Once the rate-distortion curves for the 16 CTUs aregenerated, the rate control component finds a point on each curve wherethe slope is the same for all the rate-distortion curves. The QPsassociated with those equally sloped points are the 16 global minimizingQPs for the wavelet block.

To generate the rate-distortion curves for the 16 CTUs, a rate curve anda distortion curve needs to be determined for each CTU. The encoderpipeline provides encoding statistics for each CTU to the rate controlcomponent, the encoding statistics including a discrete cosine transform(DCT) histogram (a histogram of unquantized DCT coefficients for theCTU), bit count statistics, and a distortion estimate. A key observationis that all of the quantized histograms can be derived from theunquantized histogram. Thus, the unquantized DCT histogram can be usedto extrapolate the rate-distortion curves for a respective CTU at anyQP. The rate-distortion curves for the 16 CTUs of a wavelet block in acurrent frame may be stored to a memory and used to estimate the QPs fora co-located wavelet block in a next frame. Complexity metricsdetermined for a current wavelet block may be used to correct the storedstatistics from the co-located wavelet block of a previous frame.

Embodiments of a method for determining the rate curves for the CTUs aredescribed. In embodiments, the histogram of unquantized DCT coefficientsfor a CTU is represented as a power-of-two bin structure that stores theabsolute value of the coefficients. The power-of-two bin structureallows relatively simple rate and distortion estimates to be performedin hardware by the rate control component. The bit count statistics arealso stored. When estimating the QPs for a wavelet block in a currentframe, the rate curves for the CTUs may be estimated from the respectiveDCT histograms and bit count statistics stored by the encoder.

Embodiments of a method for determining the distortion curves for theCTUs when using a biorthogonal wavelet transform to generate thesubbands are also described. Embodiments may implement a method forefficient, accurate, estimation of mean-squared error (MSE) inbiorthogonal, wavelet transforms. The encoder pipeline encodes one CTU(also referred to as a subblock) at a time, and provides a distortionestimate for that CTU to the rate control component. However, thedistortion that is of interest is the distortion after decoding andwavelet synthesis is performed on the entire block (all 16 CTUs) at thetarget device. Thus, a challenge is to estimate the contribution of thedistortion in one CTU to the distortion at the target device which comesfrom the wavelet synthesis of all 16 decoded CTUs. Embodiments of amasked estimator are described that may be used to estimate the MSEs forthe 16 CTUs. The masked estimator may implement a 5×5 weight mask foreach subband generated by the biorthogonal wavelet transform. The 5×5masks weight the errors and their correlations. Within a subband, the5×5 mask computes intra-subband error energy, and thus includesintra-subband correlations in the distortion estimate. The distortionestimates (MSEs) for the 16 CTUs may then be used to estimate thedistortion curves for the respective wavelet block.

In some embodiments, the 5×5 masks may be simplified to generatelow-complexity weight masks; the masked estimator can then apply theselow-complexity masks to each CTU in a wavelet block to generatedistortion estimates for the CTUs. The low-complexity masks approximatethe 5×5 masks with only five non-zero weights at the center, abovecenter, below center, left of center, and right of center. For the LLLL,LLHH and HH subbands, the low-complexity masks require only twomultiplies and four additions. For the LLLH, LLHL, HL and LH subbands,the low-complexity masks require only three multiplies and fouradditions. Within a subband, the low-complexity mask computesintra-subband error energy, and thus includes intra-subband correlationsin the distortion estimate. The distortion estimates (MSEs) for the 16CTUs may then be used to estimate the distortion curves for therespective wavelet block.

While embodiments of the masked estimator are described herein in thecontext of a low-latency, block-based rate control method for an encoderthat performs a wavelet transform on pixel blocks prior to encoding,embodiments of the masked estimator may also be used in any applicationto estimate distortion/MSE for biorthogonal wavelet transforms.

While embodiments of methods for determining rate-distortion curves andanalyzing those curves to determine quantization parameters for encodingare described herein in the context of an encoder that performs awavelet transform on pixel blocks prior to encoding, the methods asdescribed herein may be adapted for use in any system that does video orimage encoding in which quantization parameters for encoding need to beestimated.

While embodiments are generally described in reference to a two-levelwavelet transform that decomposes blocks of data into seven subbands,embodiments of the methods described herein may be applied to n-levelwavelet transforms that decompose blocks into 3n+1 subbands.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a video encoding and decodingsystem, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 2 is a high-level flowchart of a method of operation for VR/MRsystems that include video encoding and decoding systems as illustratedin FIG. 1 , according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method of operation for a video encodingsystem as illustrated in FIG. 1 , according to at least someembodiments.

FIG. 4 illustrates performing a wavelet transform of a pixel block thatstores pixel data to generate a wavelet block including subband dataprior to encoding, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating rate control in a video encodingsystem, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a method of operation for a video encodingsystem as illustrated in FIG. 5 , according to at least someembodiments.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating operations of a rate controlcomponent of an encoder, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a method of operation for a rate controlcomponent as illustrated in FIG. 7 , according to some embodiments.

FIG. 9 is a high-level flowchart of a method for estimating optimalquantization parameters (QPs) for a wavelet block, according to someembodiments.

FIG. 10 shows a model used in tensor analysis of the two-level, 2D casefor deriving weights for two-level, 2D MSE estimation, according to someembodiments.

FIG. 11 illustrates 5×5 masks that may be used in estimating distortionfor the subblocks representing subbands generated by a biorthogonalwavelet transform, according to some embodiments.

FIG. 12 illustrates low-complexity masks that may be used in estimatingdistortion for the subblocks representing subbands generated by abiorthogonal wavelet transform, according to some embodiments.

FIG. 13 is a chart that graphically compares MSE estimation error usingdifferent methods.

FIG. 14 illustrates an example VR/MR system that may implement a videoencoding system, according to at least some embodiments.

FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating components of a VR/MR system asillustrated in FIG. 14 , according to at least some embodiments.

This specification includes references to “one embodiment” or “anembodiment.” The appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “inan embodiment” do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment.Particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined inany suitable manner consistent with this disclosure.

“Comprising.” This term is open-ended. As used in the claims, this termdoes not foreclose additional structure or steps. Consider a claim thatrecites: “An apparatus comprising one or more processor units . . . ”Such a claim does not foreclose the apparatus from including additionalcomponents (e.g., a network interface unit, graphics circuitry, etc.).

“Configured To.” Various units, circuits, or other components may bedescribed or claimed as “configured to” perform a task or tasks. In suchcontexts, “configured to” is used to connote structure by indicatingthat the units/circuits/components include structure (e.g., circuitry)that performs those task or tasks during operation. As such, theunit/circuit/component can be said to be configured to perform the taskeven when the specified unit/circuit/component is not currentlyoperational (e.g., is not on). The units/circuits/components used withthe “configured to” language include hardware—for example, circuits,memory storing program instructions executable to implement theoperation, etc. Reciting that a unit/circuit/component is “configuredto” perform one or more tasks is expressly intended not to invoke 35U.S.C. § 112, paragraph (f), for that unit/circuit/component.Additionally, “configured to” can include generic structure (e.g.,generic circuitry) that is manipulated by software or firmware (e.g., anFPGA or a general-purpose processor executing software) to operate inmanner that is capable of performing the task(s) at issue. “Configureto” may also include adapting a manufacturing process (e.g., asemiconductor fabrication facility) to fabricate devices (e.g.,integrated circuits) that are adapted to implement or perform one ormore tasks.

“First,” “Second,” etc. As used herein, these terms are used as labelsfor nouns that they precede, and do not imply any type of ordering(e.g., spatial, temporal, logical, etc.). For example, a buffer circuitmay be described herein as performing write operations for “first” and“second” values. The terms “first” and “second” do not necessarily implythat the first value must be written before the second value.

“Based On” or “Dependent On.” As used herein, these terms are used todescribe one or more factors that affect a determination. These terms donot foreclose additional factors that may affect a determination. Thatis, a determination may be solely based on those factors or based, atleast in part, on those factors. Consider the phrase “determine A basedon B.” While in this case, B is a factor that affects the determinationof A, such a phrase does not foreclose the determination of A from alsobeing based on C. In other instances, A may be determined based solelyon B.

“Or.” When used in the claims, the term “or” is used as an inclusive orand not as an exclusive or. For example, the phrase “at least one of x,y, or z” means any one of x, y, and z, as well as any combinationthereof.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Various embodiments of a video encoding system are described.Embodiments of the video encoding system may encode high-resolutionvideo sources at low latencies for transmission over a communicationslink (e.g., a wireless link) to a device for decoding and display.Embodiments of the video encoding system may also provide gracefuldegradation of encoded video transmitted to the device to maintain adesired frame rate in varying conditions such as variations in thechannel capacity of the communications link.

An example application of the video encoding system is in virtual ormixed reality systems in which video frames containing virtual contentare rendered, encoded, and transmitted to a device for decoding anddisplay. Embodiments of a virtual or mixed reality system (referred toherein as a VR/MR system) are described in which embodiments of thevideo encoding system may be implemented. In some embodiments, the VR/MRsystem may include a device (e.g., a pad or tablet device, a smartphone,or a headset, helmet, goggles, or glasses worn by the user, referred toherein as a head-mounted device (HMD)), and a separate computing device,referred to herein as a base station. In some embodiments, the deviceand base station may each include wireless communications technologythat allows the device and base station to communicate and exchange datavia a wireless connection. In some embodiments, the device may includesensors that collect information about the user's environment (e.g.,video, depth information, lighting information, etc.) and informationabout the user (e.g., the user's expressions, eye movement, handgestures, etc.). The information collected by the sensors may betransmitted to the base station via the wireless connection. The basestation may include software and hardware (e.g., processors (system on achip (SOC), CPUs, image signal processors (ISPs), graphics processingunits (GPUs), encoder/decoders (codecs), etc.), memory, etc.) configuredto generate and render frames that include virtual content based atleast in part on the sensor information received from the device via thewireless connection. The base station may also include an embodiment ofthe video encoding system as described herein that may pre-filter,compress and transmit the rendered frames to the device for display viathe wireless connection.

Primary constraints to be considered on a wireless link includebandwidth and latency. A target of the VR/MR system is to provide a highresolution, wide field of view (FOV) virtual display to provide the userwith a high-quality VR/MR view. Another target is to minimize latencybetween the time a frame is rendered by the base station and the timethe frame is displayed by the device. However, the channel capacity ofthe wireless link may vary with time, and the wireless link may thussupport only a certain amount of information to be transmitted at anygiven time.

As shown at element 320 of FIG. 3 , in some embodiments, the videoencoding system may perform a wavelet transform on the pixel data priorto encoding to decompose the pixel data into subbands. The subbands arethen organized into blocks that are provided to a block-based encoderfor encoding/compression, as shown at element 330 of FIG. 3 . As anexample, a frame may be divided into 128×128 blocks, and a two-levelwavelet decomposition may be applied to each 128×128 block to generate16 32×32 blocks of frequency data representing seven subbands that maythen be sent to an encoder (e.g., a High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)encoder) to be encoded. The encoded frequency data is then sent to awireless interface that packetizes the encoded frequency data andtransmits the packets to the receiving device (e.g., an HMD, pad ortablet device, smartphone, etc.), as shown at element 340 of FIG. 3 . Onthe receiving device, the encoded data is de-packetized and passedthrough a block-based decoder to recover the subbands. Wavelet synthesisis then performed on the recovered subbands to reconstruct the pixeldata for display.

Various block-based methods and apparatus are described herein that maybe implemented by the video encoding system to maintain the target framerate through the wireless link and to minimize the latency in framerendering, transmittal, and display. In addition, the block-basedmethods and apparatus may provide graceful degradation of encoded videotransmitted to the device to maintain a desired frame rate in varyingconditions such as variations in the channel capacity of thecommunications link.

Image and video encoders may partition frames into blocks that arepredicted, transformed and entropy coded as individual units. Thebitrate of the resulting bitstream is the sum of the bitrates of theindividual blocks. In conventional applications, the bitrate iscontrolled at relatively low granularity by estimating the rate anddistortion of several aggregated blocks. This method works because theapplications allow moderately high encoding latency and providerelatively large bitstream buffers. However, for wireless, virtual oraugmented reality applications, latency is extremely low and bitstreambuffers are small. Thus, rate control must respond quickly to wirelesschannel changes at a fine granularity.

Embodiments of a low-latency, block-based rate control method for VR/ARsystems are described that estimates rate and distortion for videoencoding accurately and efficiently at the block level. Conventionalvideo encoders typically do not perform block-based rate control becausemost applications have moderately high encoding latency and providerelatively large bitstream buffers. In these conventional systems, ratecontrol is performed at a frame level or strip level. However, forwireless, VR/AR systems, latency is extremely low and bitstream buffersare small. Embodiments may provide rate control in which target bitratesare met for every block without packet loss under varying wirelesschannel conditions.

Embodiments of an accurate, efficient, block-based rate-estimationmethod are described that may be employed in the low-latency,block-based rate control method described herein when generatingrate-distortion curves from which quantization parameters for blocks arederived. Embodiments of the method may estimate the rate of a block towithin 5% of the true rate.

Biorthogonal wavelet transforms may, for example be used for image/videocompression and can also be added to systems that use non-waveletcompression to provide graceful degradation. In both applications, thewavelet coefficients are quantized to control the encoded bitrate.Increasing the quantization level decreases the bitrate but increasesthe distortion; conversely, decreasing the quantization level increasesthe bitrate but decreases the distortion. The distortion is usuallymeasured as the Mean-Squared Error (MSE) of the reconstructed image.Because image reconstruction is expensive (time, hardware, software) atthe encoder, the MSE associated with different quantization levels maybe estimated. Embodiments of a masked estimator for biorthogonal wavelettransform MSE estimation are described that may employ 5×5 weight masksor simplified “low complexity” weight masks for estimating MSE insubbands; the masked estimator may provide a significant reduction inestimation error with minimal complexity increase (two or threemultiplies, four additions) when compared to conventional methods thatuse single weights for estimating MSE in subbands. Embodiments of themasked estimator method for biorthogonal wavelet transform MSEestimation may, for example, be employed in the low-latency, block-basedrate control method described herein when generating rate-distortioncurves for subblocks (CTUs) of wavelet blocks from which quantizationparameters for the wavelet blocks are derived. However, embodiments ofthe masked estimator method may also be used in any application toestimate MSE for biorthogonal wavelet transforms.

Example Video Encoding System

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an example video encoding system120 that decomposes pixel data into subbands using a wavelet transformprior to encoding, according to at least some embodiments. A VR/MRsystem 10 may include at least one device 190 (e.g., a pad or tabletdevice, a smartphone, or an HMD such as a headset, helmet, goggles, orglasses that may be worn by a user) and a computing device 100 (referredto herein as a base station). The base station 100 renders VR or MRframes including virtual content, encodes the frames, and transmits theencoded frames over a wireless connection 180 to the device 190 fordecoding and display by the device 190.

In some embodiments, the device 190 may include sensors 199 that collectinformation about the user's environment (e.g., video, depthinformation, lighting information, etc.) and about the user (e.g., theuser's expressions, eye movement, gaze direction, hand gestures, etc.).The device 190 may transmit at least some of the information collectedby sensors 199 to the base station 100 via wireless connection 180. Thebase station 100 may render frames for display by the device 190 thatinclude virtual content based at least in part on the variousinformation obtained from the sensors 199, encode the frames, andtransmit the encoded frames to the device 190 for decoding and displayto the user via the wireless connection 180.

The base station 100 and device 190 may implement wirelesscommunications technology that allows the base station 100 and device190 to communicate and exchange data via a wireless connection 180.Primary constraints to be considered on the wireless connection 180between the device 190 and the base station 100 in a VR/MR system 10include bandwidth and latency. For example, in some embodiments, atarget is to provide a high resolution, wide field of view (FOV) virtualdisplay to the user at a frame rate that provides the user with ahigh-quality VR/MR view. Another target is to minimize latency betweenthe time a video frame is captured by the device and the time a renderedVR/MR frame based on the video frame is displayed by the device.

The base station 100 may include various hardware components forrendering, filtering, encoding, and transmitting video and/or images asdescribed herein, for example various types of processors, integratedcircuits (ICs), central processing units (CPUs), graphics processingunits (GPUs), image signal processors (ISPs), encoder/decoders (codecs),etc. The base station 100 may include, but is not limited to, a GPUrendering 110 component, a wireless interface 130 component, and a videoencoding system 120 that may include one or more hardware componentsthat implement various methods that may help to maintain the targetframe rate through the wireless connection 180 and to minimize thelatency in frame rendering, encoding, transmittal, and display. Thevideo encoding system 120 may include, but is not limited to, apre-filter 122 component (e.g., an N-channel filter bank), a wavelettransform 124 component, and an encoder 126 component.

GPU rendering 110 may include one or more hardware components that mayrender frames for display by the device 190 that include virtual contentbased at least in part on the various information obtained from thesensors 199.

In some embodiments, the video encoding system 120 may include one ormore hardware components that pre-filter 122 the pixel data in therendered frames prior to performing a wavelet transform 124. Pre-filter122 may, for example, reduce the resolution of the frames rendered onthe base station 100 prior to performing the wavelet transform 124,encoding 126, and transmission to the device 190 over the wirelessconnection 180, which may help in improving compression, and may reducelatency and bandwidth usage on the wireless connection 180.

In some embodiments, a wavelet transform 124 component of the videoencoding system 120 may include one or more hardware components (e.g.,an N-channel filter bank) that perform a wavelet transform on the pixeldata prior to encoding to decompose the pixel data into subbands. Thesubbands are then organized into blocks that are provided to ablock-based encoder 126 for encoding/compression. As an example, asillustrated in FIG. 4 , a frame may be divided into 128×128 blocks, anda two-level wavelet decomposition may be applied to each 128×128 blockto generate 16 32×32 blocks of frequency data (referred to as codingtree blocks (CTUs)) representing seven subbands that may then be sent toa block-based encoder (e.g., a High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)encoder) 126 to be encoded. The encoded frequency data is then sent to awireless interface 130, implemented by one or more hardware components,that packetizes the data and transmits the packets to the device 190over a wireless connection 180.

The device 190 may include various hardware components for decoding anddisplaying video and/or images as described herein, for example varioustypes of processors, integrated circuits (ICs), central processing units(CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), image signal processors(ISPs), encoder/decoders (codecs), etc. The device 190 may include, butis not limited to, a wireless interface 192, a decoder 194 component(e.g., High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) decoder), a wavelet synthesis196 component, and a display 198 component. On the device 190, thewireless interface 192 receives the packets that were transmitted overthe wireless connection 180 by the base station 100. The encoded data isde-packetized and passed through a block-based decoder 194 (e.g., a HighEfficiency Video Coding (HEVC) decoder) to recover the subbands. Waveletsynthesis 196 is then performed on the recovered frequency data toreconstruct the pixel data for display 198.

FIG. 2 is a high-level flowchart of a method of operation for VR/MRsystems that include video encoding systems as illustrated in FIG. 1 ,according to at least some embodiments. As indicated at 200, the devicesends data to the base station over the wireless connection. Asindicated at 210, the base station renders frames including virtualcontent based at least in part on the device data. As indicated at 220,an encoding component on the base station compresses the rendered dataand sends the compressed data to the device over the wirelessconnection. As indicated at 230, the device decompresses and displaysthe virtual content to generate a 3D virtual view for viewing by theuser. As indicated by the arrow returning from 240 to 200, the methodcontinues as long as the user is using the VR/MR system.

In some embodiments, rather than rendering and encoding entire frames inthe base station and transmitting the rendered frames to the device, thebase station may render and encode parts of frames (referred to asstrips) and transmit the encoded strips to the device as they are ready.A strip may, for example, be a row of 128×128 pixel blocks.

Conventionally, a rate control component of the encoding componentestimates quantization parameters (QPs) at the strip or frame level.Embodiments of a block-based, low latency video rate control method aredescribed that estimate QPs for each block in a strip. Thus, embodimentsmay determine QPs for encoding blocks at the block level, rather than atthe strip or frame level.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method of operation for a video encodingsystem as illustrated in FIG. 1 , according to at least someembodiments. The method of FIG. 3 may, for example, be performed atelement 120 of FIG. 1 . The method of FIG. 3 assumes strip-basedencoding and transmission is being performed.

As indicated at 310, the pre-filter component applies filters to pixelblocks in a strip of the frame. In some embodiments, pre-filtering mayinclude performing a lens warp on the frames on the base station priorto the wavelet transform. The lens warp is performed to correct for thedistortion of the images introduced by the lenses on the device that theimages are viewed through, thus improving quality of the images. In someembodiments, the device may store lens warp data for the lenses, forexample generated by a calibration process, and may provide the lenswarp data to the base station over the wireless connection. The basestation may then perform the lens warp on the frames based on the lenswarp data for that device. Performing the lens warp on the base stationin the pre-filter stage may reduce the resolution of the frames prior toperforming the wavelet transform and encoding, which may help inimproving compression, and may reduce latency and bandwidth usage on thewireless link. In addition, by performing the lens warp on the basestation in the pre-filter stage rather than on the device afterdecoding, filtering of the image data may only need to be performedonce, as opposed to performing filtering on the base station to reduceresolution prior to encoding and then performing lens warp filtering onthe device.

In some embodiments, pre-filtering at 310 may also include filtering toreduce resolution in peripheral regions while maintaining higherresolution in foveated regions. In some embodiments, gaze trackinginformation obtained from the device may be used to identify thedirection in which the user is currently looking. A region of the framethat corresponds to the fovea (referred to as the foveated region) maybe identified based at least in part on the determined gaze direction.The peripheral region (i.e. the portion of the frame outside thefoveated region) may be pre-filtered to reduce information based onknowledge of the human vision system, for example by filtering highfrequency information and/or increasing color compression. Pre-filteringof the peripheral region may help to provide improved compression of theframe.

As indicated at 320, the wavelet transform component applies a wavelettransform technique to the pixel blocks to decompose the pixel data intoN (e.g., 7) subbands. The subbands are organized into subblocks (e.g.,coding tree units CTUs)) in wavelet blocks; the subblocks are providedto a block-based encoder for encoding/compression. As an example, aframe may be divided into 128×128 pixel blocks, and a two-level waveletdecomposition may be applied to each 128×128 pixel block to generate awavelet block including 16 32×32 subblocks of frequency datarepresenting seven subbands, for example as illustrated in FIG. 4 , andthe 16 subblocks may then be encoded by the encoder.

As indicated at 330, the encoder applies an encoding technique to thesubblocks of the wavelet blocks to compress the data. The encoder may,for example, be a High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) encoder. However,other encoding techniques may be used in some embodiments. A ratecontrol component of the encoder estimates quantization parameters (QPs)for the 16 subblocks (CTUs) in each wavelet block and passes the QPs toan encoder pipeline component of the encoder that encodes the CTUsaccording to the respective QPs. Thus, embodiments determine QPs forencoding at the block level, rather than at the strip or frame level.Embodiments of methods for efficiently determining the QPs for the 16CTUs in a wavelet block is described herein.

As indicated at 340, the wireless interface packetizes the compresseddata and sends the packets to the device over a wireless connection.

At 350, if there are more strips in the current frame to be encoded andtransmitted, the method returns to element 310 to process the nextstrip. Otherwise, at 360, if there are more frames to be encoded andtransmitted, the method returns to element 310 to begin processing thestrips of the next frame.

FIG. 4 illustrates performing a wavelet transform of a pixel block thatstores pixel data to generate subband data prior to encoding, accordingto at least some embodiments. The video encoding system may compress128×128 pixel blocks 404 from strips 402 in a frame 400. In thisexample, a two-level wavelet decomposition is applied by the wavelettransform 424 component to each 128×128 pixel block 404 to generate a128×128 wavelet block 406 including sixteen 32×32 subblocks of frequencydata representing seven subbands. These subblocks (CTUs) are thenprovided to an encoder 426 for encoding. For example, the CTUs may bewritten to a buffer by the wavelet transform 424 component, and readfrom the buffer by an encoder pipeline 450 component of the encoder 426.A rate control component 430 of the encoder estimates quantizationparameters (QPs) for the 16 CTUs in each wavelet block 406 and passesthe QPs to the encoder pipeline 450. Thus, embodiments determine QPs forencoding wavelet blocks 406 at the block level, rather than at the stripor frame level. Embodiments of methods for efficiently determining theQPs for the 16 CTUs in a wavelet block 406 is described herein.

In the labels of the CTUs, the letter L represents a low pass filter,and the letter H represents a high pass filter. The CTUs labeled withtwo letters represent a one-level (2D) wavelet transform ordecomposition. In the CTUs labeled with two letters (representing threeof the seven subbands LH, HL, and HH), the first letter represents avertical filter (either high or low) performed first, and the secondletter represents a horizontal filter (either high or low) performedsecond. The CTUs labeled with four letters represent a two-level wavelettransform or decomposition. In the CTUs labeled with four letters, thefirst two letters (LL) indicate that there was first a vertical low passfilter followed by a horizontal low pass filter; the second two lettersindicate that the resulting LL block was then filtered four ways, LL,LH, HL, and HH (thus generating four of the seven subbands (LLLL, LLLH,LLHL, and LLHH).

In the labels of the CTUs, the numbers (CTU 0, CTU 1, . . . CTU 15)represent an example order of processing of the CTUs by the encoderpipeline 450. Note, however, that other orders of processing may be usedin some embodiments.

In some embodiments, decomposing the pixel data into subbands asillustrated in FIG. 4 allows the subbands to be buffered and processedas separate streams by the encoder pipeline 450. Processing the subbandsas separate streams allows the encoder pipeline 450 to multiplex theprocessing of the independent streams. In block-based encoding methodssuch as HEVC encoding, blocks (referred to as coding tree units (CTUs))are processed in a block processing pipeline at multiple stages; two ormore CTUs may be at different stages of the pipeline at a given clockcycle, and the CTUs move through the pipeline as the clock cycles. Theprocessing of a given CTU may have dependencies on one or morepreviously processed neighbor blocks, for example one or more CTUs inthe row above the given CTU and/or the CTU to the left of the given CTU.By multiplexing the processing of the streams of subband data, theencoder 426 spaces out the processing of the CTUs in a given stream,thus providing additional clock cycles to process a neighbor CTU onwhich a given CTU has dependencies. For example, the CTU to the left ofthe given CTU may be several stages ahead of the given CTU in theencoding pipeline when the given CTU reaches a stage that depends on thepreviously processed neighbor CTU. This allows the encoder pipeline 450to better handle dependencies on previously processed CTUs, and reducesor eliminates the need to wait for completion of processing of aneighbor CTU in the pipeline before processing the given CTU at a stagethat depends on the neighbor CTU.

In addition, decomposing the pixel data into subbands as illustrated inFIG. 4 may allow the subbands to be prioritized by the encoder 426 andthe wireless interface. Typically, in image and video transmission, thelower frequencies are more important, while the higher frequencies areless important. Higher frequencies usually correspond to details in theimage, and thus can be considered as lower priority. The higher subbandscontain a smaller percentage of the energy in the image. Most of theenergy is contained in the lower subbands. Decomposing the pixel datainto subbands thus provides a priority ordering to the data stream thatcan be leveraged by the encoder 426 and the wireless interface whenencoding and transmitting the data stream. For example, in someembodiments, different compression techniques may be used on thedifferent subbands, with more aggressive compression applied to thelower priority bands, and more conservative compression applied to thehigher priority bands. As another example, the priority ordering of thesubbands may help in providing graceful degradation of the VR/MR system.Performance of the wireless connection can be monitored, and feedbackfrom the device may be considered, to track performance of the overallsystem. If the system is falling behind for some reason, for example ifthe wireless connection degrades and bandwidth capacity of the wirelessconnection drops below a threshold, the encoder 426 and wirelessinterface may prioritize the encoding and transmission of one or more ofthe lower subbands, and may reduce or drop the encoding and/ortransmission of one or more of the frequency levels that have beenassigned a lower priority level, for example one or more of the highersubbands.

As described above, the wavelet transform decomposes an image intosubbands. In some embodiments, this may be leveraged to send the samesignal to displays of varying resolution. As an example, suppose that atwo-level wavelet decomposition is applied to decompose the signal intoseven bands. If four of the bands are sent (LLLL, LLLH, LLHL and LLHH),the bands may be reconstructed to the original intended resolution atless visual quality. As an alternative, the bands may also bereconstructed at ¼th resolution (½ in each dimension) which may besuitable for a display panel with smaller display resolution.

While embodiments are generally described in reference to a two-levelwavelet transform that decomposes blocks of data into seven subbands,embodiments of the methods described herein may be applied to n-levelwavelet transforms that decompose blocks into 3n+1 subbands.

Block-Based, Low Latency Rate Control

An encoder may employ a rate control method or algorithm to dynamicallyadjust encoder parameters to achieve a target bitrate. A rate controlmethod may estimate video bitrate based on the available bandwidth ofthe wireless connection. The estimated bitrate may be used to adjust theencoder parameters to ensure that the coded bit stream can betransmitted successfully while optimizing usage of the availablebandwidth. Typically, rate control methods for video streaming systemswork over a time constant of a strip, frame or two frames to estimatevideo bitrate and adjust encoder parameters accordingly.

A target of a VR/MR system that implements an embodiment of the videoencoding system as described herein may be to provide very low latencybetween the time the virtual content is rendered on the base station andthe time the virtual content is displayed on the device while minimizingerrors (e.g., dropped packets) and maximizing bandwidth usage over thewireless connection. Another constraint on VR/MR systems is memory. Thetargeted low latency and memory constraint for the system is a challengefor rate control in the encoder when encoding data to be transmittedover the wireless connection to the device.

In some embodiments, the video encoding system includes a wavelettransform component that performs a 2-layer wavelet decomposition thatdecomposes blocks of pixels (e.g., 128×128 blocks) from a strip of aframe into multiple (e.g., seven) different subbands represented insubblocks (e.g., 16 32×32 CTUs) of a wavelet block, followed by ablock-based encoder such as HEVC that encodes the subbands. In someembodiments, to perform rate control under the strict latencyrequirements and memory constraints of the VR/MR system, instead ofworking over a time constant of a strip, frame or two frames to adjustencoder parameters, a rate control component may estimate or adjustencoder parameters for each wavelet block (e.g., the quantizationparameters for the 16 CTUs in the wavelet block).

In some embodiments, complexity statistics may be calculated for theCTUs in a wavelet block, for example by a complexity analysis componentof the video encoding system. The complexity statistics may then be usedby the rate control component to adjust the quantization parameters forthe CTUs in the wavelet block.

In some embodiments, the rate control component may store rate controlstatistics for one or more previously processed frames. Storedstatistics for co-located blocks (e.g., quantization parameters for theCTUs in the blocks) may be used by the rate control component indetermining quantization parameters for a current block being processedin the video encoding system. In some embodiments, complexity statisticsfor the current block may be determined and used by the rate controlcomponent to adjust the quantization parameters from a co-located blockto generate the quantization parameters for the current block.

In embodiments of a rate control component as described herein, thequantization parameters for the CTUs in a block may be calculatedglobally to jointly optimize bandwidth usage and the overall displayedquality of the video data after decoder reconstruction and waveletsynthesis is performed on the target device. Embodiments of the ratecontrol component may implement a method for rate allocation between theCTUs in a block that estimates quantization parameters (QPs) for theCTUs in a block (e.g., QPs for the 16 CTUs in a wavelet block (WB)) tominimize wavelet-inverse distortion given a rate bound for the waveletblock:

$\begin{matrix}{{\underset{{QP}_{0},{\ldots.{QP}_{15}}}{minimize}{{{W^{- 1}({WB})} - {W^{- 1}H^{- 1}{H({WB})}}}}_{2}^{2}},{{{subject}{to}{\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{15}R_{n}}} \leq R_{wbTarget}}} & (1)\end{matrix}$where W⁻¹ is the inverse wavelet transform, H is the HEVC encoding ofCTU_(n) with QP_(n) for 0<=n<=15, H⁻¹ is the HEVC decoding of encodedCTU_(n) for 0<=n<=15, R_(n) is the number of bits required toHEVC-encode CTU_(n) with QP_(n), and R_(wbTarget) is the target rate forthe wavelet block.

Embodiments of the rate control component may implement a method toestimate the global minimizing QPs for a wavelet block in which, foreach CTU in the wavelet block, a curve is generated (referred to as arate-distortion curve) that maps the distortion and the number of bits(rate) for that CTU. A given point on a rate-distortion curve indicatesdistortion at a given bit rate for the corresponding CTU. Once therate-distortion curves for the 16 CTUs are generated, the rate controlcomponent finds a point on each curve where the slope is the same forall the rate-distortion curves. The QPs associated with those equallysloped points are the 16 global minimizing QPs for the current waveletblock.

To generate the rate-distortion curves for the 16 CTUs, a rate curve anda distortion curve needs to be determined for each CTU. The encoderprovides encoding statistics for each CTU to the rate control component,the encoding statistics including a discrete cosine transform (DCT)histogram (a histogram of unquantized DCT coefficients for the CTU), bitcount statistics, and a distortion estimate. A key observation is thatall of the quantized histograms can be derived from the unquantizedhistogram. Thus, the unquantized DCT histogram can be used toextrapolate the rate-distortion curves for a respective CTU at any QP.The rate-distortion curves for the 16 CTUs of a wavelet block in acurrent frame may be stored to a memory and used to estimate the QPs fora co-located wavelet block in a next frame. Complexity metricsdetermined for a current wavelet block may be used to correct the storedstatistics from the co-located wavelet block of a previous frame.

Embodiments of a method for determining the rate curves for the CTUs aredescribed. The histogram of unquantized DCT coefficients for a CTU isrepresented as a power-of-two bin structure that stores the absolutevalue of the coefficients. The power-of-two bin structure allowsrelatively simple rate and distortion estimates to be performed inhardware by the rate control component. The bit count statistics arealso stored. When estimating the QPs for a wavelet block in a currentframe, the rate curves for the CTUs may be estimated from the respectiveDCT histograms and bit count statistics stored by the encoder.

Embodiments of a method for determining the distortion curves for theCTUs when using a biorthogonal wavelet transform to generate thesubbands are also described. Embodiments may implement a method forefficient, accurate, estimation of mean-squared error (MSE) inbiorthogonal, wavelet transforms. The encoder pipeline encodes one CTU(also referred to as a subblock) at a time, and provides a distortionestimate for that subblock to the rate control component. However, thedistortion that is of interest is the distortion after decoding andwavelet synthesis is performed on the entire encoded block (all 16subblocks) at the target device. Thus, a challenge is to estimate thecontribution of the distortion in one subblock (CTU) to the distortionat the target device which comes from the wavelet synthesis of all 16decoded CTUs. Embodiments of a masked estimator are described that canbe applied to each CTU to estimate the MSE for the CTU (i.e., thedistortion of the wavelet inverse of a biorthogonal subband). The maskedestimator may implement a 5×5 weight mask for each subband generated bythe biorthogonal wavelet transform. The 5×5 masks weight the errors andtheir correlations. Within a subband, the 5×5 mask computesintra-subband error energy, and thus includes intra-subband correlationsin the distortion estimate. The distortion estimates (MSEs) for the 16subblocks may then be used to estimate the distortion curves for therespective wavelet block.

In some embodiments, the 5×5 masks may be simplified using thresholdingto generate low-complexity weight masks; the masked estimator can thenapply these low-complexity masks to each subblock to generate distortionestimates for the subblocks. The low-complexity masks approximate the5×5 masks with only five non-zero weights at the center, above center,below center, left of center, and right of center. For the LLLL, LLHHand HH subbands, the low-complexity masks require only two multipliesand four additions. For the LLLH, LLHL, HL and LH subbands, thelow-complexity masks require only three multiplies and four additions.Within a subband, the low-complexity mask computes intra-subband errorenergy, and thus includes intra-subband correlations in the distortionestimate. The distortion estimates (MSEs) for the 16 CTUs may then beused to estimate the distortion curves for the respective wavelet block.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating rate control in a video encodingsystem, according to at least some embodiments. In some embodiments,pixel blocks (PBs 504) from rendered strips of a frame that includepixel data may be first processed by a pre-filter component (not shown).The output of the pre-filter is processed by a wavelet transform 524component. In some embodiments, the wavelet transform 524 componentperforms a 2-layer wavelet decomposition that decomposes blocks ofpixels (e.g., 128×128 blocks) from a strip of a frame into multiple(e.g., seven) different subbands represented in 16 CTUs, as shown inFIG. 4 .

In some embodiments, the wavelet blocks including CTUs representing thesubbands for a strip of pixel blocks 504 may be buffered 505 after thewavelet transform 524 so that CTU complexity metrics (CMs) may becalculated across the subbands for the wavelet blocks in the strip by acomplexity analysis 525 component of the video encoding system prior toencoding. In some embodiments, for each CTU, the complexity metric is anN-bit estimate of the entropy of that CTU. The complexity analysis 525component provides the CMs for the CTUs in each wavelet block of thestrip to the rate control 530 component of the encoder 526. In someembodiments, the rate control 530 component receives the CMs for allCTUs in a strip before the encoder pipeline 550 begins to encode thestrip.

In some embodiments, the quantization parameters for the CTUs in awavelet block may be calculated by the rate control 530 componentjointly to allocate the rate between the subbands while optimizing theoverall displayed quality (i.e., minimizing distortion) of the blocksafter decoder reconstruction and wavelet synthesis is performed on atarget device. The rate control 530 component may, for example, use theCMs for a wavelet block in combination with rate control statistics froma co-located wavelet block from a previous frame accessed from memory540 and wireless bit rate information from wireless interface 570 toestimate quantization parameters for the CTUs in a wavelet block (WB) ofthe current frame. In some embodiments, the stored statistics for aco-located wavelet block may include rate-distortion (RD) curves for theCTUs in the wavelet block, quantization parameters (QPs) for the CTUs,complexity metrics (CMs) for the CTUs, and a lambda value for thewavelet block (WB lambda) determined from the RD curves. The WB lambdais the “equal-lambda point” or “equal slope point” on the CTU RD curvesdetermined by the rate control 530 component; the WB lambda indicates orcorresponds to the optimal CTU QPs for the wavelet block.

Rate control statistics for the current wavelet block may be stored tomemory 540. In some embodiments, the stored statistics for a currentwavelet block may include RD curves for the CTUs in the wavelet block,QPs for the CTUs, CMs for the CTUs, and the WB lambda for the waveletblock.

The rate control 530 component provides the estimated quantizationparameters for the CTUs in the current wavelet block to the encoderpipeline 550, which uses the quantization parameters to encode the CTUsof the wavelet block. The encoded CTUs are provided to the wirelessinterface 570, which packetizes and transmits the encoded CTUsrepresenting the subbands over a wireless connection 580 to a targetdevice. Encoding statistics for the current wavelet block are passedback to the rate control 530 component by the encoder pipeline 550. Theencoder pipeline 550 provides encoding statistics for each CTU in thewavelet block to the rate control 530 component. In some embodiments,the encoding statistics may include a discrete cosine transform (DCT)histogram (a histogram of unquantized DCT coefficients for the CTU), CTUbit count statistics, and a CTU distortion estimate. The rate control530 component may use the encoding statistics for the current waveletblock in generating the WB statistics for the current wavelet block,which are then stored to memory 540.

A goal of the video encoding system is to optimize quality of the videostream to the device while maximizing bandwidth usage and minimizinglatency over the wireless connection 580 to the device. In someembodiments, to help achieve this goal, the wireless interface 570 mayprovide current wireless connection information as feedback to the ratecontrol 530 component of the encoder 526. The rate control 530 componentmay use this information in determining quantization parameters for theCTUs in the wavelet blocks. In some embodiments, the wireless interface570 may track the instantaneous bit rate of the wireless connection 580,and feeds the current bit rate back to the rate control 530 component.The rate control 530 component then uses this instantaneous bit rate asa constraint when estimating the QPs for wavelet blocks. In someembodiments, before encoding a strip, the rate control 530 componentuses the instantaneous bit rate to determine R_(stripTarget), the targetnumber of bits for all wavelet blocks contained in the strip.R_(stripTarget) may be allocated proportionally to each wavelet block.In some embodiments, more bits may be allocated from R_(stripTarget) towavelet blocks that contain CTUs with larger complexity metrics, whilefewer bits may be allocated to wavelet blocks that contain CTUs withsmaller complexity metrics. The number of bits allocated to a waveletblock may be referred to as a rate bound for the wavelet block.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a method of operation for a video encodingsystem as illustrated in FIG. 5 , according to at least someembodiments. In some embodiments, the pixel blocks (e.g., 128×128blocks) from a strip of a frame are first processed by a pre-filtercomponent, for example an N-channel filter bank, as indicated at 600.

As indicated at 610, a wavelet transform component decomposes the pixelblocks (e.g., 128×128 blocks) from the strip into N (e.g., 7) subbandsto generate wavelet blocks (e.g., 128×128 blocks containing 16 32×32CTUs). In some embodiments, the wavelet transform component performs a2-layer wavelet decomposition that decomposes blocks of pixels (e.g.,128×128 blocks) from a strip of a frame into multiple (e.g., seven)different subbands. In some embodiments, wavelet blocks (e.g., 128×128blocks) including CTUs (e.g., 16 32×32 CTUs) representing the subbandsfor a strip of pixel blocks may be buffered after the wavelet transformso that complexity statistics may be calculated across the subbands forthe strip by a complexity analysis component of the video encodingsystem prior to encoding.

As indicated at 620, a complexity analysis component calculatescomplexity statistics for the CTUs in a strip. In some embodiments, foreach CTU, the complexity metric is an N-bit estimate of the entropy ofthat CTU. The complexity analysis component provides the CM for the CTUsin each wavelet block of the strip to the rate control component of theencoder. In some embodiments, the rate control component receives theCMs for all CTUs in a strip before the encoder begins to encode thestrip.

As indicated by the arrow returning from element 620 to element 610,elements 610 and 620 may be performed for each strip in a frame.

As indicated at 630, the rate control component of the encoderdetermines quantization parameters for the CTUs in a wavelet block basedat least in part on stored rate control statistics from a co-locatedblock of a previous frame. The rate control component may, for example,use the CMs for the current wavelet block in combination with storedrate control statistics for a co-located wavelet block from a previousframe accessed from memory and wireless bit rate information fromwireless interface to estimate quantization parameters for the CTUs inthe wavelet block of the current frame. In some embodiments, the storedstatistics for a co-located wavelet block may include rate-distortion(RD) curves for the CTUs in the wavelet block, quantization parameters(QPs) for the CTUs, complexity metrics (CMs) for the CTUs, and a lambdavalue for the wavelet block (WB lambda) determined from the RD curves.The WB lambda is the “equal-lambda point” or “equal slope point” on theCTU RD curves determined by the rate control component; the WB lambdaindicates or corresponds to the optimal CTU QPs for the wavelet block.

In some embodiments, the wireless interface may track the instantaneoustotal bit rate of the wireless connection, and feeds the current bitrate back to the rate control component, which uses the instantaneousbit rate as a constraint when estimating the QPs for wavelet blocks. Insome embodiments, before encoding a strip, the rate control 530component uses the instantaneous bit rate to determine R_(stripTarget),the target number of bits for all wavelet blocks contained in the strip.R_(stripTarget) may be allocated proportionally to each wavelet blocks.In some embodiments, more bits may be allocated from R_(stripTarget) towavelet blocks that contain CTUs with larger complexity metrics, whilefewer bits may be allocated to wavelet blocks that contain CTUs withsmaller complexity metrics. The number of bits allocated to a waveletblock may be referred to as a rate bound for the wavelet block.

The rate control component provides the quantization parameters for theCTUs in the current wavelet block that were determined from the storedrate control statistics for the co-located block in the previous frameto the encoder pipeline, for example as a vector including 16 QP values.

As indicated at 640, the encoder pipeline (e.g., an HEVC encoderpipeline) applies an encoding technique to the CTUs in the currentwavelet block using the quantization parameters provided by the ratecontrol component to compress the data. The rate control componentprovides the quantization parameters for the CTUs in the current waveletblock to the encoder pipeline of the encoder, which uses thequantization parameters to encode the CTUs in the wavelet block. Theencoded CTUs are provided to the wireless interface of the base station.The encoder pipeline feeds back encoding statistics for each CTU in thewavelet block to the rate control component. In some embodiments, theencoding statistics may include a discrete cosine transform (DCT)histogram (a histogram of unquantized DCT coefficients for the CTU), CTUbit count statistics, and a CTU distortion estimate.

As indicated at 650, the rate control component may use the encodingstatistics for the wavelet block received from the encoding pipeline togenerate WB statistics for the wavelet block. In some embodiments,quantization parameters for the CTUs in the wavelet block may becalculated by the rate control component jointly to allocate the ratebetween the subbands while optimizing the overall displayed quality(i.e., minimizing distortion) of the blocks after decoder reconstructionand wavelet synthesis is performed on a target device. The rate controlstatistics for the wavelet block may be stored to memory by the ratecontrol component. In some embodiments, the stored rate controlstatistics for a wavelet block may include RD curves for the CTUs in thewavelet block, QPs for the CTUs, CMs for the CTUs, and a WB lambda forthe wavelet block. The stored rate control statistics for the waveletblock may then be used to determine the QPs for the CTUs in a co-locatedblock of a next frame.

As indicated by the arrow returning from element 650 to element 630,elements 630 through 650 may be performed for each block in a strip.

As indicated at 660, the wireless interface packetizes and sends thecompressed data to the device over the wireless connection. In someembodiments, the wireless interface may provide current wirelessconnection information as feedback to the rate control component of theencoder. The rate control component may use this information indetermining rate bounds and quantization parameters for the subblocks(CTUs) of wavelet blocks.

As indicated by the arrow returning from element 670 to element 610, themethod may continue as long as there is data to be transmitted to thedevice.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating operations of a rate controlcomponent of an encoder, according to at least some embodiments.

In some embodiments, a complexity analysis 725 component calculatescomplexity statistics for the CTUs in a strip from a current frame. Insome embodiments, for each CTU, the complexity metric is an N-bitestimate of the entropy of that CTU. The complexity analysis 725component provides the CM for the CTUs in each wavelet block of thestrip to the rate control 730 component of the encoder. In someembodiments, the rate control 730 component receives the CMs for allCTUs in a strip before the encoder begins to encode the strip.

In some embodiments, the wireless interface 770 may track theinstantaneous bit rate of the wireless connection 780, and feeds thecurrent bit rate back to the rate control 730 component. The ratecontrol 730 component then uses this instantaneous bit rate as aconstraint when estimating the QPs for wavelet blocks. In someembodiments, before encoding a strip from a current frame, a rateallocation 734 component of rate control 730 uses the instantaneous bitrate to determine R_(stripTarget), the target number of bits for allwavelet blocks contained in the strip. R_(stripTarget) may be allocatedproportionally to each wavelet blocks. In some embodiments, more bitsmay be allocated from R_(stripTarget) to wavelet blocks that containCTUs with larger complexity metrics, while fewer bits may be allocatedto wavelet blocks that contain CTUs with smaller complexity metrics. Thenumber of bits allocated to a wavelet block may be referred to as a ratebound for the wavelet block.

Rate control 730 component generates rate-distortion (RD) curves forevery CTU processed in the encoder pipeline 750 based on the followingdata stored by the encoding pipeline 750:

-   -   a discrete cosine transform (DCT) histogram (a histogram of        unquantized DCT coefficients for the CTU);    -   bit count statistics from CABAC encoding of the CTU at a        particular QP; and    -   a CTU distortion estimate.

A rate estimation 732 component may determine a rate curve based on theDCT histograms and the bit count statistics using a rate estimationmethod as described herein. A distortion estimation 733 component maydetermine a distortion curve based on the DCT histograms and the CTUdistortion estimates using a distortion estimation method as describedherein. A rate-distortion curve analysis 738 component may determine the16 QPs and WB lambda for each wavelet block based on analysis of therespective RD curve as described herein.

The RD curves for all CTUs in a frame are stored in memory 750. Thestored RD curves are used by a CTU QP estimation 736 component of ratecontrol 730 in combination with rate allocation 734 output to estimatethe rate of the co-located CTU blocks on the next frame at any QP value.The CTU complexity metrics for each wavelet block in the current frameare also stored in memory 740 and used to scale the RD curves beforerate estimation. The QPs for the CTUs in the wavelet blocks of thecurrent frame, determined from the stored RD curves for the CTUs in thewavelet blocks the previous frame, are provided to encoder pipeline 750and used there to encode the respective CTUs 705 in the current frame.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a high-level method of operation for a ratecontrol component as illustrated in FIG. 7 , according to someembodiments. Note that, for an initial frame, WB statistics from aprevious frame are not available. As indicated at 800, rate controlbegins processing a next wavelet block (WB). At 800, if co-located WBstatistics are not available for the WB (e.g., if the WB is in a firstframe), then initial QPs for the current WB may be estimated and passedto the encoder pipeline. At 800, if co-located WB statistics areavailable for the WB, then rate control obtains co-located WB statisticsfrom memory as indicated at 820. As indicated at 822, rate controlestimates QPs for the current WB from the co-located WB statistics,complexity metrics for the current WB, and rate information for the WBand passes the QPs to the encoder pipeline.

At 830, the encoder pipeline processes the CTUs of the WB using the QPsreceived from rate control and stores encoder statistics (DCThistograms, bit count statistics, and distortion estimates).

At 840, rate control generates WB statistics for the current WB based atleast in part on the encoder statistics for the current WB and storesthe WB statistics for the current WB to memory.

At 850, if there are more WBs to be processed, the method returns toelement 800. Otherwise, the method is done.

Finding QPs to Minimize Wavelet-Inverse Distortion Given Rate Bound

In embodiments of a rate control component as illustrated in FIGS. 5 and7 , the quantization parameters for the CTUs in a wavelet block may becalculated globally to jointly optimize bandwidth usage and the overalldisplayed quality of the video data after decoder reconstruction andwavelet synthesis is performed on the target device. Embodiments of therate control component may implement a method for rate allocationbetween the subbands in a block that estimates quantization parameters(QPs) for the CTUs in a block (e.g., QPs for the 16 CTUs in a waveletblock (WB)) to minimize wavelet-inverse distortion for the wavelet blockgiven a rate bound for the wavelet block:

$\begin{matrix}{{\underset{{QP}_{0},{\ldots.{QP}_{15}}}{minimize}{{{W^{- 1}({WB})} - {W^{- 1}H^{- 1}{H({WB})}}}}_{2}^{2}},{{{subject}{to}{\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{15}R_{n}}} \leq R_{wbTarget}}} & (1)\end{matrix}$where W⁻¹ is the inverse wavelet transform, H is the HEVC encoding ofCTU_(n) with QP_(n) for 0<=n<=15, H⁻¹ is the HEVC decoding of encodedCTU_(n) for 0<=n<=15, R_(n) is the number of bits required toHEVC-encode CTU_(n) with QP_(n), and R_(wbTarget) is the target ratebound.

Embodiments of the rate control component may implement a method toestimate the global minimizing QPs for a wavelet block in which, foreach CTU in a wavelet block (i.e., the 16 CTUs), a curve is generated(referred to as a rate-distortion curve) that maps the distortion andthe number of bits (rate) for that CTU. A given point on arate-distortion curve indicates distortion at a given bit rate for thecorresponding CTU. Once the rate-distortion curves for the 16 CTUs aregenerated, the rate control component finds a point on each curve wherethe slope is the same for all the rate-distortion curves. The QPsassociated with those equally sloped points are the 16 global minimizingQPs for the current wavelet block.

To generate the rate-distortion curves for the 16 CTUs, a rate curve anda distortion curve need to be determined for each CTU. The encoderprovides encoding statistics for each CTU to the rate control component,the encoding statistics including a discrete cosine transform (DCT)histogram (a histogram of unquantized DCT coefficients for the CTU), bitcount statistics, and a distortion estimate. A key observation is thatthe unquantized DCT histogram contains all of the quantized histograms.Thus, the unquantized DCT histogram can be used to extrapolate therate-distortion curves for a respective CTU at any QP. Therate-distortion curves for the 16 CTUs of a wavelet block in a currentframe may be stored to a memory and used to estimate the QPs for aco-located wavelet block in a next frame. Complexity metrics determinedfor a current wavelet block may be used to correct the stored statisticsfrom the co-located wavelet block of a previous frame.

FIG. 9 is a high-level flowchart of a method for estimating optimalquantization parameters (QPs) for a wavelet block, according to someembodiments. The method of FIG. 9 may, for example, be performed atelement 840 of FIG. 8 . The CTUs in a wavelet block may be compressed byan encoder pipeline of an encoder using QPs determined from waveletblock statistics for a co-located wavelet block in a previous frame thatwere stored to a memory. Encoding statistics for each of the CTUsincluding but not limited to an unquantized DCT histogram, bit countstatistics, and a distortion estimate determined in part using a maskedestimator described below may be passed to a rate control component ofthe encoder.

Elements 900 through 930 may be performed by the rate control componentof the encoder. As indicated at 900, a rate curve is generated for theCTU based on the unquantized DCT histogram and bit count statistics forthe CTU. As indicated at 910, a distortion curve is generated for theCTU based on the unquantized DCT histogram and the distortion estimatefor the CTU. As indicated at 920, elements 900 and 910 are performed forall 16 CTUs in the wavelet block to generate the 16 rate-distortioncurves for the wavelet block. As indicated at 930, the 16 optimal QPsfor the 16 CTUs in the wavelet block are estimated based on the 16rate-distortion curves and a rate bound for the wavelet block determinedfrom instantaneous bit rate statistics received from a wirelessinterface. For example, a bisection search may be used to find a pointon each curve where the slope is the same for all the rate-distortioncurves. The QPs associated with those equally sloped points are the 16global minimizing QPs for the wavelet block. Wavelet block statisticsfor the wavelet block, including but not limited to the rate-distortioncurves, the optimal QPs, complexity metrics, and a WB lambda may bestored to the memory for use in encoding a co-located wavelet block on anext frame.

Rate Estimation

Embodiments of a method for determining the rate curves for the CTUs aredescribed. In embodiments, the histogram of unquantized DCT coefficientsfor a CTU is represented as a power-of-two bin structure that stores theabsolute value of the coefficients. The power-of-two bin structureallows relatively simple rate and distortion estimates to be performedin hardware by the rate control component. The bit count statistics arealso stored. When estimating the QPs for a wavelet block in a currentframe, the rate curves for the CTUs may be estimated from the respectiveunquantized DCT histograms and bit count statistics stored by theencoder.

The rate control component generates Rate vs QP Curves (RQCs) for everyCTU processed in the encoder pipeline based on the following data storedby the encoding pipeline:

-   -   a discrete cosine transform (DCT) histogram (a histogram of        unquantized DCT coefficients for the CTU); and    -   bit count statistics (BCS) from CABAC encoding of the CTU at a        particular QP.

In some embodiments, the RQCs for all CTUs in a frame are stored inmemory. The stored RQCs are used by the rate control component toestimate the rate of the co-located CTU blocks on the next frame at anyQP value. The CTU complexity metrics for each wavelet block in thecurrent frame are also stored in memory and used to scale the RQCsbefore rate estimation.

In some embodiments, for each CTU, the RQC is a structure that includes:

-   -   integer rate[3][7]    -   integer QP_actual

In some embodiments, a GPP (Gradient Per Pixel) complexity metric (gpp)of each wavelet block may be used to scale all RQCs in that waveletblock. The GPP complexity metric is described in Jing, Xuan, Lap-PuiChau, and Wan-Chi Siu, “Frame complexity-based rate-quantization modelfor H. 264/AVC intraframe rate control.” IEEE Signal processing letters15 (2008): 373-376.

For each CTU, the DCT histogram (DCTH₁) may be a structure thatincludes:

-   -   integer bin₁[16]    -   integer numTwos₁    -   integer sumNonZero₁

In some embodiments, the DCTH₁ bins tally luma DCT coefficients beforequantization, or equivalently at quantization step size (qstep)=1. Inthe preceding notation, the subscript (1) indicates that the histogramrepresents DCT coefficients at qstep=1. The bin widths increase in sizeexponentially. The bin₁[i] counts the frequency of unquantized, luma DCTcoefficients whose magnitude is in the interval [floor(2^((i-1))),2^(i)−1], for 0<=i<=15. The last bin (bin₁[15]) counts the frequency ofDCT coefficients whose magnitude is in the interval [16384, 32768].Thus, the association of intervals to bins is as follows:

bin₁[0] : [0, 0]bin₁[1] : [1, 1]bin₁[2] : [2, 3]bin₁[3] : [4, 7]bin₁[4] : [8, 15]…bin₁[14] : [8192, 16383]bin₁[15] : [16384, 32768]

To better estimate coeffAbsGt2₁ (see below), the numTwos₁ field tracksthe number of 2s in bin₁[2]. The sumNonZero₁ field holds the sum of allbin frequencies except for bin₁[0].

For each CTU, the BCS is a structure with fields that correspond tosyntax elements that were aggregated while CABAC encoding the entire CTUat a particular QP. Here are the BCS fields:

-   -   1. integer total_(actual): stores the total number of bits        required for CABAC encoding of the CTU.    -   2. integer partitioning_(actual): stores the number of bits        required to encode how the CTU was partitioned.    -   3. integer residual_(actual)[3]: stores the number of bits        required to encode Y, Cb and Cr residuals.    -   4. integer sigCoeff_(actual): stores the number of bits required        to encode all luma sig_coeff_flag symbols in the CTU.    -   5. integer coeffAbsGt1_(actual): stores the number of bits        required to encode all luma coeff_abs_level_greater1_flag        symbols in the CTU.    -   6. integer coeffAbsGt2_(actual): stores the number of bits        required to encode all luma coeff_abs_level_greater2_flag        symbols in the CTU.    -   7. integer remain_(actual): stores the number of bits required        to encode all luma coeff_abs_level_remaining symbols in the CTU.    -   8. integer otherCoeff_(actual): stores the difference between        residual_(actual)[0] and the sum of #4, #5, #6, #7.

The BCS fields are related thusly:

-   -   a)        total_(actual)=partitioning_(actual)+residual_(actual)[0]+residual_(actual)[1]+residual_(actual)[2],        where residual_(actual)[0], residual_(actual)[1],        residual_(actual)[2] are the number of bits for residuals of Y,        Cb, Cr components    -   b)        residual_(actual)[0]=otherCoeff_(actual)+sigCoeff_(actual)+coeffAbsGt1_(actual)+coeffAbsGt2_(actual)+remain_(actual)        Rate Vs QP Curve (RQC) Estimation

To implement an efficient RQC estimation algorithm in hardware, thefollowing should be considered:

-   -   I. The length of the CABAC binarization of the        coeff_abs_level_remaining syntax element scales logarithmically        with the magnitude of the DCT coefficient. Table 1 shows a        representation of coeff_abs_level_remaining binarization as a        concatenation of a unary prefix and a fixed length suffix,        according to some embodiments.    -   II. For any dyadic qstep, the histogram of quantized DCT        coefficients can be derived from DCTH₁ by performing simple        operations on the bin fields of DCTH₁. (A dyadic quantity is one        that can be expressed as a power of two: 2^(N), for natural N.)

To illustrate (II), let DCTH_(qstep) denote a structure analogous toDCTH₁ in which the fields represent the histogram of DCT coefficientsafter quantization by qstep. The DCTH_(qstep) is a structure thatincludes these fields:

-   -   integer bin_(qstep)[16]    -   integer numTwos_(qstep)    -   integer sumNonZero_(qstep)

The following examples illustrate the derivation of DCTH_(qstep) fromDCTH₁ for qstep=2N, N>0.

When qstep=2:

bin₂[0] = bin₁[0] + bin₁[1], bin₂[1] = bin₁[2], bin₂[2] = bin₁[3], …bin₂[14] = bin₁[15], bin₂[15] = 0.

When qstep=4:

bin₄[0] = bin₁[0] + bin₁[1] + bin₂[2], bin₄[1] = bin₁[3], bin₄[2] = bin₁[4], …bin₄[13] = bin₁[15], bin₄[14] = bin₄[15] = 0.

Thus, the DCT histogram for any dyadic qstep can be derived from thefrequencies of unquantized coefficients in the DCTH₁ using relativelysimple arithmetic.

TABLE 1 Prefix Suffix Total Max z Prefix bins Suffix bins length lengthlength k 0~2 · 2^(k) − 1 0 C 1 k  1 + k 4 1 · 2^(k)~2 · 2^(k) − 1 10 C 2k  2 + k 4 2 · 2^(k)~3 · 2^(k) − 1 110 C 3 k  3 + k 4 2^(k) · (2⁰ +2)~2^(k) · (2¹ + 2) − 1 1110 C 4 k  4 + k 4 2^(k) · (2¹ + 2)~2^(k) ·(2² + 2) − 1 111110 xC 5 1 + k  6 + k 4 2^(k) · (2² + 2)~2^(k) · (2³ +2) − 1 1111110 xxC 6 2 + k  8 + k 4 2^(k) · (2³ + 2)~2^(k) · (2⁴ + 2) −1 11111110 xxxC 7 3 + k 10 + k 4 2^(k) · (2⁴ + 2)~2^(k) · (2⁵ + 2) − 1111111110 xxxxC 8 4 + k 12 + k 4 2^(k) · (2⁵ + 2)~2^(k) · (2⁶ + 2) − 11111111110 xxxxxC 9 5 + k 14 + k 4 2^(k) · (2⁶ + 2)~2^(k) · (2⁷ + 2) − 111111111110 xxxxxxC 10 6 + k 16 + k 4 2^(k) · (2⁷ + 2)~2^(k) · (2⁸ + 2)− 1 111111111110 xxxxxxxC 11 7 + k 18 + k 4 2^(k) · (2⁸ + 2)~2^(k) ·(2⁹ + 2) − 1 1111111111110 xxxxxxxxC 12 8 + k 20 + k 4 2^(k) · (2⁹ +2)~2^(k) · (2¹⁰ + 2) − 1 11111111111110 xxxxxxxxxC 13 9 + k 22 + k 42^(k) · (2¹⁰ + 2)~2^(k) · (2¹¹ + 2) − 1 111111111111110 xxxxxxxxxxC 1410 + k  24 + k 4 2^(k) · (2¹¹ + 2)~2^(k) · (2¹² + 2) − 11111111111111110 xxxxxxxxxxxC 15 11 + k  26 + k 3 2^(k) · (2¹² +2)~2^(k) · (2¹³ + 2) − 1 11111111111111110 xxxxxxxxxxxxC 16 12 + k  28 +k 2 2^(k) · (2¹³ + 2)~2^(k) · (2¹⁴ + 2) − 1 111111111111111110xxxxxxxxxxxxxC 17 13 + k  30 + k 1 2^(k) · (2¹⁴ + 2)~2^(k) · (2¹⁵ + 2) −1 1111111111111111110 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxC 18 14 + k  32 + k 0Luma Rate Estimation at Dyadic Qstep

The following is an example algorithm that may be used to estimate theluma rate at a dyadic qstep, in some embodiments:

-   -   1. Derive DCTH_(qstep) from DCTH₁    -   2. From DCTH_(qstep) fields, estimate these CABAC syntax        elements for CTU coefficients quantized by qstep:        -   a) sigCoeffBits_(est)=sumNonZero_(qstep)        -   b) coeffAbsGt1_(est)=sigCoeffBits_(est)−bin_(qstep)[1]        -   c) coeffAbsGt2_(est)=coeffAbsGt1_(est)−numTwos_(qstep)        -   d) remainBits_(est)=weighted sum of expected values of            binarization lengths of coeff_abs_level_remaining symbols            associated with each DCTH_(qstep) bin.            -   Each DCTH_(qstep) bin is associated with one or more                rows of Table 1.            -   The binarization length of the symbol in a row is given                by the Total length column of Table 1.            -   The expectation assumes that coefficients are uniformly                distributed within DCTH_(qstep) bins.            -   The weight of each DCT_(qstep) bin is its frequency.    -   3. Compute correction factors for 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d by comparing        against the corresponding bit count statistics (BCS) fields.    -   4. Estimate partitioning and other bits by scaling:        If sumNonZero₁>0        scaleFactor=clip(sumNonZero_(qstep)/sumNonZero₁,0,2)        partitioning_(est)=partitioning_(actual)*scaleFactor        otherCoeff_(est)=otherCoeff_(actual)*scaleFactor        Else        partitioning_(est)=partitioning_(actual)        otherCoeff_(est)=otherCoeff_(actual)

5.Rate_(est)(QP)=partitioning_(est)+otherCoeff_(est)+sigCoeffBits_(est)+coeffAbsGt1_(est)+coeffAbsGt2_(est)+remainBits_(est)

Luma RQC Estimation

The following is an example algorithm that may be used to estimate theluma RQC at QPs associated with dyadic qsteps:

For each QP in {16, 22, 28, 34, 40, 46, 63}:qstep=2^((QP-4)/6)RQC.rate[0][QP]=Rate_(est)[QP]Chroma RQC Estimation

The chroma RQC may be estimated by assuming that chroma rates scaleproportionally to luma rates:

For each chromaId in {1, 2}:

-   -   For each QP in {16, 22, 28, 34, 40, 46, 63}:        RQC.rate[chromaId][QP]=residual_(actual)[chromaId]*RQC.rate[0][QP]/(residual_(actual)[0]+partitioning_(actual))        RQC Corrections

The RQCs for all CTUs in a frame are stored in memory and may be used toestimate co-located CTU rates in the next frame. In some embodiments,one or more corrections may be applied to the RQCs before they are usedfor estimation.

Additive Correction Term from Pre-Coded Estimate

Before a CTU is encoded, the co-located, previous-frame RQCs are used toestimate the CTU rate after encoding at a desired QP denoted byQP_actual. This estimated rate isR_(est)=RQC.rate[0][QP_actual]+RQC.rate[1][QP_actual]+RQC.rate[2][QP_actual].

The CTU is then encoded at QP_actual and the actual coded rate isobtained from the BCS as R_(actual)=total_(actual). As explainedearlier, the BCS and DCTH₁ are used to generate RQCs that will be usedon the next frame. The difference R_(actual)−R_(est) is a correctionterm. Assuming that the co-located CTU on the next frame is similar,this correction is applicable to the RQC estimate on the next frame.Therefore, the correction term, R_(actual)−R_(est), may be added to theRQCs before storing them in memory with RQC.QP_actual=QP_actual.

Propagative Correction Term from Co-Located RQC

In the section titled Luma Rate Estimation at dyadic qstep, thecorrection factors are accurate at QP_actual and less accurate at QPsfarthest away from QP_actual. Consequently, the rate estimate atQP_actual is exact and the rate estimates at QPs farthest away fromQP_actual are less accurate. If the co-located CTU on the previous framewas similar to the current CTU and was encoded at QP′_(actual) withQP′_(actual)≠QP_actual, then the co-located RQCs can be used to generatecorrection terms that are most effective at QPs close to QP′_(actual).Therefore, these propagative correction terms may be added to thecurrent RQCs before storing them in memory.

Multiplicative Correction Factor from Complexity Ratio

The CTU rate estimate may be based on co-located RQCs in the previousframe. This estimate is accurate if the co-located and current CTUs aresimilar. Typically, such CTUs are indeed similar, but their RQCs maydiffer to some extent. To account for these differences, a complexityscaling factor may be computed:scaleFactor_(cmplxty)=gpp/gpp′,where gpp and gpp′ are the GPP complexities of the current andco-located wavelet blocks, respectively. Before using the co-locatedRQCs to estimate the current CTU rate, all rates in the co-located RQCsmay be scaled by scaleFactor_(cmplxty) to scale the co-located RQCs sothat they are applicable to the current CTU.Distortion Estimation

Embodiments of a method for determining the distortion curves for theCTUs when using a biorthogonal wavelet transform to generate thesubbands are described. Embodiments may implement a method forefficient, accurate, estimation of mean-squared error (MSE) inbiorthogonal, wavelet transforms. The encoder pipeline encodes one CTU(also referred to as a subblock) at a time, and provides a distortionestimate for that CTU to the rate control component. However, thedistortion that is of interest is the distortion after decoding andwavelet synthesis is performed on the entire block (all 16 subblocks(CTUs) covering seven subbands, for example as illustrated in FIG. 4 )at the target device. Thus, a challenge is to estimate the contributionof the distortion in one CTU to the distortion at the target devicewhich comes from the wavelet synthesis of all 16 decoded CTUs.

Embodiments of a masked estimator are described that can be applied toeach CTU to estimate the MSE for the CTU (i.e., the distortion of thewavelet inverse of a biorthogonal subband). The masked estimator mayimplement a 5×5 weight mask for each subband generated by thebiorthogonal wavelet transform. The 5×5 masks weight the errors andtheir correlations. Within a subband, the 5×5 mask computesintra-subband error energy, and thus includes intra-subband correlationsin the distortion estimate. The distortion estimates (MSEs) for the 16CTUs may then be used to estimate the distortion curves for therespective wavelet block.

In some embodiments, the 5×5 masks may be simplified using thresholdingto generate low-complexity weight masks; the masked estimator can thenapply these low-complexity masks to error correlations in each subbandto generate distortion estimates for the CTUs. The low-complexity masksapproximate the 5×5 masks with only five non-zero weights at the center,above center, below center, left of center, and right of center. For theLLLL, LLHH and HH subbands, the low-complexity masks require only twomultiplies and four additions. For the LLLH, LLHL, HL and LH subbands,the low-complexity masks require only three multiplies and fouradditions. Within a subband, the low-complexity mask computesintra-subband error energy, and thus includes intra-subband correlationsin the distortion estimate. The distortion estimates (MSEs) for the 16CTUs may then be used to estimate the distortion curves for therespective wavelet block.

Biorthogonal wavelet transforms may, for example be used for image/videocompression and can also be added to systems that use non-waveletcompression to provide graceful degradation. In both applications, thewavelet coefficients are quantized to control the encoded bitrate.Increasing the quantization level decreases the bitrate but increasesthe distortion; conversely, decreasing the quantization level increasesthe bitrate but decreases the distortion. The distortion is usuallymeasured as the Mean-Squared Error (MSE) of the reconstructed image.Because image reconstruction is expensive (time, hardware, software) atthe encoder, the MSE associated with different quantization levels maybe estimated. Embodiments of the masked estimator for biorthogonal MSEmay provide a significant reduction in estimation error with minimalcomplexity increase (two or three multiplies, four additions) whencompared to conventional methods for estimating distortion.

Embodiments of the masked estimator for biorthogonal wavelet transformMSE estimation may, for example, be employed in the low-latency,block-based rate control method described herein when generatingrate-distortion curves from which quantization parameters for blocks arederived. However, embodiments of the masked estimator may also be usedin any application to estimate MSE for biorthogonal wavelet transforms.

For each CTU, the distortion estimate (DE) is an estimate of thecontribution of the quantized CTU to the sum of squared error after HEVCdecoding and the inverse wavelet transform. Mathematically:DE_(CTU)≈2¹⁰ ∥W ⁻¹ H ⁻¹ H(CTU)−W ⁻¹(CTU)∥₂ ²where W⁻¹ is the inverse wavelet transform, H is the HEVC encoding ofCTU, and H⁻¹ is the HEVC decoding of encoded CTU.

As previously mentioned, the distortion that is of interest is thedistortion after decoding and wavelet synthesis is performed on theencoded wavelet block at the target device (referred to as totaldistortion for the wavelet block, or D_(wb)). A challenge is to estimatethe contribution of the distortion in the individual subblocks to thetotal distortion at the target device, which comes from the waveletsynthesis of all 16 decoded CTUs. A method to estimate the totaldistortion for a wavelet block is to sum the weighted distortion (MSE)in each subblock (CTU). Assuming a wavelet block with 16 CTUs thatrepresent seven subbands as illustrated in FIG. 4 :

${D_{wb} = {\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{15}{w_{n}\left( {DE}_{{CTU}_{n}} \right)}}},$where w_(n) are weights for 0≤n≤15^(n).

A challenge is to determine the weights to use to estimate MSE for theCTUs. Since the 16 subblocks (CTUs) represent seven subbands (LLLL,LLLH, LLHL, LLHH, LH, HL, and HH), seven distinct weights are needed.

A previous method used power spectral density to derive the weights (J.Woods, T. Naveen—A filter based bit allocation scheme for subbandcompression of HDTV, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 1(3),436-440, 1992). Usevitch used tensor analysis to derive similar weightsto those of Woods-Naveen (B. Usevitch—Optimal bit allocation forbiorthogonal wavelet coding, Proceedings of the Data Compression Conf.,1996). However, both of these methods ignore intra-subband andinter-subband correlations, and thus exhibit up to 30% error at lowerpeak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR).

In particular, Usevitch makes two assumptions to make the mathtractable:

-   -   Assumption 1: no inter-subband correlation, so ignore cross        terms.    -   Assumption 2: no intra-subband correlation, so autocorrelation        is diagonal.

Usevitch' method generates seven single weights for the seven subbands.Usevitch provides details for the 1D, single-level case only. However,Usevitch does not provide tensor analysis of the two-level, 2D case asshown in the model of FIG. 10 and described below. In embodiments asdescribed below, tensor analysis is performed without assuming thatthere is no (or negligible) intra-subband correlation. Thus, fullcorrelation is used. By not making the assumptions made by Usevitch,instead of generating a single weight to apply to subbands as inUsevitch, N×N (e.g., 5×5) masks may be generated that weight the errorsand their correlations within the subbands. This method thus generatesan N×N (e.g., 5×5) weight mask for each subband generated by thebiorthogonal wavelet transform (LLLL, LLLH, LLHL, LLHH, LH, HL, and HH),for example as illustrated in FIG. 11 , which shows example 5×5 masksusing a (1,2) normalization technique, for example as described inSection 2.2.3 of Rabbani, Majid, and Rajan Joshi. “An overview of theJPEG 2000 still image compression standard.” Signal processing: Imagecommunication 17.1 (2002): 3-48. A masked estimator can then apply theseN×N masks to errors and their correlations in each subband to generatedistortion estimates for the subbands. The masks compute intra-subbandenergy and thus consider intra-subband correlations in the distortionestimates. By applying the N×N weight masks instead of the singleweights, a more accurate distortion estimate may be produced (e.g., 5%or less error, at lower PSNR, instead of up to 30% error usingconventional methods).

Referring to FIG. 10 , the following describes a tensor analysis of thetwo-level, 2D case for deriving weights for two-level, 2D MSEestimation:

-   -   e_(is)=row-major error vector at Level i with        s=0/1/2/3=LL/LH/HL/HH    -   G_(ij)=Upsample/filter matrix at Level i with        j=0/1=lowpass/highpass    -   G_(ij)⊗G_(ik)=tensor product of G_(ij) and G_(ik)    -   tr: trace function. The trace of a square matrix is the sum of        elements on the main diagonal.

e = 10 e 10 + 11 e 11 + 12 e 12 + 13 e 13 + 01 e 01 + 02 e 02 + 03 e 03 ⁢where 10 = ( G 00 ⊗ G 00 ) ⁢ ( G 10 ⊗ G 10 ) , and 10 , ( G 00 ⊗ G 00 ) ,and ⁢ N 2 / 16 , respectively , 11 = ( G 00 ⊗ G 00 ) ⁢ ( G 10 ⊗ G 11 ) ,12 = ( G 00 ⊗ G 00 ) ⁢ ( G 11 ⊗ G 10 ) , 13 = ( G 00 ⊗ G 00 ) ⁢ ( G 11 ⊗ G11 ) , 01 = ( G 00 ⊗ G 01 ) , where 01 has ⁢ dimension ⁢ N 2 × N 2 / 4 ,02 = ( G 01 ⊗ G 00 ) , 03 = ( G 01 ⊗ G 01 ) . ( 1 )The distortion is the mean-squared error given by:

σ e 2 = 1 N 2 ⁢ E [ e T ⁢ e ] = 1 N 2 ⁢ E [ ( Σ a ∈ S a e a ) T ⁢ ( Σ b ∈ Sb e b ) ] , where ⁢ S = { 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 01 , 02 , 03 } =  1 N 2 ⁢E [ Σ a ∈ S ⁢ e a T a T Σ b ∈ S b e b ] = 1 N 2 ⁢ E [ tr ⁡ ( Σ a ∈ S a e a ⁢Σ b ∈ S ⁢ e b T b T ) ] = 1 N 2 ⁢ E [ tr ⁡ ( Σ a ∈ S a e a ⁢ e a T a T ) ] ,ignore ⁢ cross - terms ⁢ assuming ⁢ no ⁢  ⁢ inter - subband ⁢ correlations .= 1 N 2 ⁢ E [ tr ⁢ Σ a ∈ S a T a e a ⁢ e a T ] σ e 2 = 1 N 2 ⁢ tr ⁢ Σ a ∈ S aT a R e a ⁢ e a , ( 2 )

-   -   where R_(e) _(a) _(e) _(a) is the non-diagonal autocorrelation        because intra-subband correlations are not ignored.        E _(e)=Σ_(α∈S) tr(        _(a) ^(T)        _(a) R _(e) _(a) _(e) _(a) )  (3)    -   where E_(e)=N²σ_(e) ² which is numerically more stable than        σ_(e) ².

$\begin{matrix}{R_{e_{a}e_{a}} = \begin{bmatrix}e_{0}^{2} & {e_{0}e_{1}} & {e_{0}e_{2}} & {e_{0}e_{3}} & \ldots \\{e_{1}e_{0}} & e_{1}^{2} & {e_{1}e_{2}} & {e_{1}e_{3}} & \\{e_{2}e_{0}} & {e_{2}e_{1}} & e_{2}^{2} & {e_{2}e_{3}} & \\{e_{3}e_{0}} & {e_{3}e_{1}} & {e_{3}e_{2}} & e_{3}^{2} & \\ \vdots & & & & e_{N}^{2}\end{bmatrix}} & (4)\end{matrix}$

The M^(th) row of

_(a) ^(T)

_(a) is a row-majored vector representing a finitely-supported mask ofthis form:

col = M/N↓ $\begin{matrix}{{row} = \left. {M{mod}N}\rightarrow\begin{bmatrix} & & & \cdots & & & \\ & \gamma_{1} & \gamma_{2} & \gamma_{3} & \gamma_{4} & \gamma_{5} & \\ \cdot & \gamma_{6} & \gamma_{7} & \gamma_{8} & \gamma_{9} & \gamma_{10} & \cdot \\ \cdot & \gamma_{11} & \gamma_{12} & \gamma_{13} & \gamma_{14} & \gamma_{15} & \cdot \\ \cdot & \gamma_{16} & \gamma_{17} & \gamma_{18} & \gamma_{19} & \gamma_{20} & \cdot \\ \cdot & \gamma_{21} & \gamma_{22} & \gamma_{23} & \gamma_{24} & \gamma_{25} & \\ & & & \cdots & & & \end{bmatrix} \right.} & (5)\end{matrix}$

Correspondingly the M^(th) column of R_(e) _(a) _(e) _(a) is arow-majored vector representing this matrix:

$\begin{matrix}{R_{M} = \begin{bmatrix} & & & \cdots & & & \\ & {e_{r,c}e_{{r - 2},{c - 2}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r - 2},{c - 1}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r - 2},c}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r - 2},{c + 1}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r - 2},{c + 2}}} & \\ \cdot & {e_{r,c}e_{{r - 1},{c - 2}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r - 1},{c - 1}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r - 1},c}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r - 1},{c + 1}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r - 1},{c + 2}}} & \cdot \\{\cdot} & {e_{r,c}e_{r,{c - 2}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{r,{c - 1}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{r,c}} & {e_{r,c}e_{r,{c + 1}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{r,{c + 2}}} & {\cdot} \\ \cdot & {e_{r,c}e_{{r + 1},{c - 2}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r + 1},{c - 1}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r + 1},c}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r + 1},{c + 1}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r + 1},{c + 2}}} & \cdot \\ & {e_{r,c}e_{{r + 2},{c - 2}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r + 2},{c - 1}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r + 2},c}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r + 2},{c + 1}}} & {e_{r,c}e_{{r + 2},{c + 2}}} & \\ & & & \cdots & & & \end{bmatrix}} & (6)\end{matrix}$where r=M mod N, c=M/N.

tr (

_(a) ^(T)

_(a)R_(e) _(a) _(e) _(a) ) requires only the products of the M^(th) rowof

_(a) ^(T)

_(a) and the M^(th) column of R_(e) _(a) _(e) _(a) for all M. Therefore:

tr ⁡ ( a T a R e a ⁢ e a ) = Σ M ⁢ e r , c [ γ 1 ⁢ e r - 2 , c - 2 + γ 2 ⁢ er - 2 , c - 1 + γ 3 ⁢ e r - 2 , c + γ 4 ⁢ e r - 2 , c + 1 + γ 5 ⁢ e r - 2 ,c + 2 + γ 6 ⁢ e r - 1 , c - 2 + γ 7 ⁢ e r - 1 , c - 1 + γ 8 ⁢ e r - 1 , c +γ 9 ⁢ e r - 1 , c + 1 + γ 10 ⁢ e r - 1 , c + 2 + γ 11 ⁢ e r , c - 2 + γ 12 ⁢e r , c - 1 + γ 13 ⁢ e r , c + γ 14 ⁢ e r , c + 1 + γ 15 ⁢ e r , c + 2 + γ16 ⁢ e r + 1 , c - 2 + γ 17 ⁢ e r + 1 , c - 1 + γ 18 ⁢ e r + 1 , c + γ 19 ⁢e r + 1 , c + 1 + γ 20 ⁢ e r + 1 , c + 2 + γ 21 ⁢ e r + 2 , c - 2 + γ 22 ⁢e r + 2 , c - 1 + γ 23 ⁢ e r + 2 , c + γ 24 ⁢ e r + 2 , c + 1 + γ 25 ⁢ er + 2 , c + 2 ] ( 7 )for LLLL, LLHH, HH subbands.

Equation 3 is the general solution for the two-level, 2D case. Using a(5,3) filter bank (for example as described in Rabbani, Majid, and RajanJoshi. “An overview of the JPEG 2000 still image compression standard.”Signal processing: image communication 17.1 (2002): 3-48) in thisequation gives the finite-support 5×5 mask in Equation 5. Theautocorrelation R_(e) _(a) _(e) _(a) in Equation 6 multiplies againstthis mask. Equation 7 shows the product of the mask and theautocorrelation. Substituting the specific (5,3) filter-bankcoefficients into

_(a) for each subband yields the masks in FIG. 11 . Due to symmetry,these masks have fewer than 25 distinct coefficients. For the specificexample of FIG. 11 , the mask is 5×5. In general, for other filters(other than the 5,3-filterbank), the mask may be larger or smaller than5×5.

Implementing the 5×5 masks as illustrated in FIG. 11 in hardware may becomputationally expensive. Thus, the 5×5 weight masks may be simplifiedusing thresholding to generate low-complexity weight masks asillustrated in FIG. 12 that are less computationally expensive toimplement in hardware. These low-complexity masks approximate the 5×5masks of FIG. 11 with only five non-zero weights at the center, abovecenter, below center, left of center, and right of center. For the LLLL,LLHH and HH subbands, the low-complexity masks require only twomultiplies and four additions. For the LLLH, LLHL, HL and LH subbands,the low-complexity masks require only three multiplies and fouradditions. A masked estimator can then apply these low-complexity masksto error correlations in each subband to generate distortion estimatesfor the subbands. By applying the low-complexity masks instead of thesingle weights, a more accurate distortion estimate may be produced (5%error, at lower PSNR, instead of up to 30% error using conventionalmethods).

For the specific example of FIG. 12 , the 5×5 mask of FIG. 11 isthresholded to get five non-zero weights. In general, for other filters(other than the 5,3-filterbank), the mask could be larger or smallerthan 5×5. With larger thresholds, the low-complexity mask (FIG. 12 )could have more than 5 non-zero weights.

FIG. 13 is a chart that graphically compares MSE estimation error usingdifferent methods. In particular, note the improvement at lower PSNRwhen using the masked estimator (2) that applies masks (in this example,the 5×5 masks of FIG. 11 ) when compared to conventional methods thatuse single weights (3).

In some embodiments, the 5×5 masks or the low-complexity masks for thesubbands may be stored in a look-up table (LUT) for access by the maskedestimator. Alternatively, the masks may be hardcoded as multipliers inan ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit), or otherwise stored.

The masked estimator may, for example, be used in an encoder todetermine distortion estimates (MSEs) for the 16 subblocks thatrepresent the seven subbands, which may then be used in estimating thedistortion curves for the respective wavelet block. The following is anexample algorithm that may be used to estimate the distortion curves forthe 16 subblocks (CTUs), in some embodiments:

For each CTU:

-   -   1. Get the original CTU (the CTU before encoding) and the        reconstructed CTU (the reconstructed CTU may be generated by        decoding the encoded CTU and applying an inverse wavelet        function)    -   2. Apply the masked estimator to the original CTU and the        reconstructed CTU to get MSE_(Actual) of the CTU (MSE_(Actual)        represents the distortion of a wavelet inverse of the        biorthogonal subband represented in the CTU). In some        embodiments, the masked estimator applies the 5×5 mask for the        subband corresponding to the CTU as illustrated in FIG. 11 . In        some embodiments, the masked estimator applies the        low-complexity mask for the subband corresponding to the CTU as        illustrated in FIG. 12 .    -   3. Apply quantization step size (qstep) to the unquantized DCT        histogram for the CTU to estimate the quantized DCT histogram        for the CTU.    -   4. Estimate distortion MSE_(Est) by determining how many        coefficients move between bins of the unquantized and quantized        DCT histograms.    -   5. Compute a correction factor:        MSE_(CorrnFactor)=MSE_(Actual)/MSE_(Est)

Estimate the distortion curves for the 16 subblocks (CTUs):

-   -   6. For CTU_(i):        -   a) For each QP=16:6:51 (qsteps are powers of 2)            -   i) qstep=2^((QP-4))            -   ii) Apply qstep to unquantized histogram to get                quantized histogram            -   iii) D_(i)(QP)=MSE_(CorrnFactor)*MSE_(Est)                Rate-Distortion Curve Analysis

In embodiments of a rate control component as described herein, thequantization parameters for the subblocks in a block may be calculatedglobally to jointly optimize bandwidth usage and the overall displayedquality of the video data after decoder reconstruction and waveletsynthesis is performed on the target device. Embodiments of the ratecontrol component may implement a method for rate allocation between thesubbands in a block that estimates quantization parameters (QPs) for thesubblocks in a block (e.g., QPs for the 16 CTUs in a wavelet block (WB))to minimize wavelet-inverse distortion given a rate bound:

$\begin{matrix}{{\underset{{QP}_{0},{\ldots.{QP}_{15}}}{minimize}{{{W^{- 1}({WB})} - {W^{- 1}H^{- 1}{H({WB})}}}}_{2}^{2}},{{{subject}{to}{\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{15}R_{n}}} \leq R_{wbTarget}}} & (1)\end{matrix}$where W⁻¹ is the inverse wavelet transform, H is the HEVC encoding ofCTU_(n) with QP_(n) for 0<=n<=15, H⁻¹ is the HEVC decoding of encodedCTU_(n) for 0<=n<=15, R_(n) is the number of bits required toHEVC-encode CTU_(n) with QP_(n), and R_(wbTarget) is the target ratebound.

Embodiments of the rate control component may implement a method toestimate the global minimizing QPs for a wavelet block in which, foreach subblock (CTU) of the wavelet block, a curve is generated (referredto as a rate-distortion curve) that maps the distortion and the numberof bits (rate) for that CTU. To generate the rate-distortion curves forthe CTUs, a rate curve and a distortion curve may be estimated for eachCTU as described above in the sections titled Rate estimation andDistortion estimation. A given point on the rate-distortion curveindicates distortion at a given bit rate for the corresponding CTU. Oncethe rate-distortion curves for the CTUs are generated, the rate controlcomponent finds a point on each curve where the slope is the same forall the rate-distortion curves. The QPs associated with those equallysloped points are the global minimizing QPs for the current waveletblock.

In some embodiments, to find a point on each curve where the slope isthe same for all the rate-distortion curves, a bisection search may beused. A bisection search algorithm has been described to find optimalquantizers for wavelet-packet bases (K. Ramchandran, M. Vetterli—Bestwavelet packet bases in a Rate-Distortion Sense, IEEE Transactions onImage Processing, April 1993). Although the algorithm cannot be applieddirectly to HEVC encoding of wavelet subbands, concepts from theresearch can be exploited to obtain the optimal QPs for a wavelet block.

A first concept relates to setting QPs for independent blocks (CTUs)which are encoded to meet the R_(wbTarget) bound collectively. OptimalQPs occur at Rate-Distortion (RD) points for which the slope isidentical across all CTUs. The sum of the rates at these particular RDpoints is less than (but as close as possible to) R_(wbTarget). Theslope of the RD curve is usually denoted by lambda, and the optimal QPsare said to exist at the “equal-slope point” or “equal-lambda point” onthe RD curves.

A second concept is that the equal-lambda point can be found by abisection search that converges in a few iterations. Specifically, for agiven lambda value and CTU, the best RD point minimizes the functionalJ(lambda)=D+lambda*R, and has slope equal to lambda. Furthermore, forlambda values greater than the optimal equal-lambda point, the sum ofthe best RD points across CTUs exceeds R_(wbTarget). Conversely, forlambda values less than the equal-lambda point, the sum of the best RDpoints across CTUs is below R_(wbTarget).

Thus, embodiments may implement a bisection search method to findlambda. The method starts with lambda_(U)=0 and finds (R_(U), D_(U)) asthe sum of rates and distortions across all CTUs with lambda_(U).Similarly, lambda_(L)=INT_MAX is used to determine (R_(L), D_(L)). IfR_(U)=R_(wbTarget) (or R_(L)=R_(wbTarget)), the search terminates andthe optimal QPs for the wavelet block are those associated with theequal-lambda RD points that summed to R_(U) (or R_(L)) across all CTUs.Otherwise, the [lambda_(U), lambda_(L)] interval is refined and thesearch is repeated.

Applications and Advantages of the Block-Based Low Latency Rate ControlMethods

In some embodiments of an encoding system, the block-based low latencyrate control methods described herein may be used to determine QPs forencoding every pixel block processed by the system. In theseembodiments, the CTU rate-distortion curves are generated and used todetermine CTU-level QPs for every block as described herein. This methodadapts quickly to a fluctuating channel, minimizes packet loss, andpreserves visual quality. An efficient bisection search is used toestimate the optimal QPs for all the CTUs in a wavelet block from theCTU rate-distortion curves without getting stuck in local minima. Amasked estimator is used in determining the distortion curves thatsignificantly improves MSE estimation over conventional methods. Anunquantized DCT histogram for each CTU that contains all of thequantized histograms for the CTU is leveraged to efficiently determinethe rate and distortion curves used to estimate the optimal QPs. Inaddition, the block-based low latency rate control methods may requireless memory (e.g., memory for buffering) than conventional rate controlmethods that determine rate at the strip or frame level.

In some embodiments, the wireless interface may be monitored forperformance. When the wireless channel is good (e.g., availablebandwidth is above a threshold), strip-level QPs may be determined, forexample from aggregated CTU rate-distortion curves generated by the ratecontrol component using the methods described herein, and thestrip-level QPs may be used to encode the subbands across the strip. TheQPs can be modulated at the CTU level based on visual heuristics and theCTU rate-distortion curves. Without the CTU rate-distortion curves, thestrip rate may fluctuate by ˜25%. When the wireless channel is not good(e.g., available bandwidth is below a threshold), the strip-level QP isnot used, as busy areas in the strip may result in packet drops.Instead, the CTU rate-distortion curves are generated and used todetermine CTU-level QPs for every block in a strip as described herein.This method adapts quickly to a fluctuating channel, minimizes packetloss, and preserves visual quality.

Example VR/MR System

FIG. 14 illustrates an example VR/MR system 2000 that may implement avideo encoding system, according to at least some embodiments. A VR/MRsystem 2000 may include at least one device 2150 (e.g., a notebook orlaptop computer, pad or tablet device, smartphone, hand-held computingdevice or an HMD such as a headset, helmet, goggles, or glasses that maybe worn by a user) and a computing device 2100 (referred to herein as abase station). The base station 2100 renders VR or MR frames includingvirtual content, encodes the frames, and transmits the encoded framesover a wireless connection 2180 to the device 2150 for decoding anddisplay by the device 2150.

The base station 2100 and device 2150 may each include wirelesscommunications technology that allows the base station 2100 and device2150 to communicate and exchange data via the wireless connection 2180.Commercial (e.g., Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc.) or proprietary wirelesscommunications technologies may be used in various embodiments.

In some embodiments, the device 2150 may include sensors that collectinformation about the user's environment (e.g., video, depthinformation, lighting information, etc.) and/or about the user (e.g.,the user's expressions, eye movement, gaze direction, hand gestures,etc.). The device 2150 may transmit at least some of the informationcollected by sensors to the base station 2100 via wireless connection2180. The base station 2100 may render frames for display by the device2150 that include virtual content based at least in part on the variousinformation obtained from the sensors, encode the frames, and transmitthe encoded frames to the device 2150 for decoding and display to theuser via the wireless connection 2180. To encode and transmit theframes, the base station 2100 may implement a video encoding system asillustrated in FIGS. 1 through 13 .

FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating functional components of andprocessing in an example VR/MR system as illustrated in FIG. 14 ,according to some embodiments. Device 2150 may be, but is not limitedto, a notebook or laptop computer, pad or tablet device, smartphone,hand-held computing device or an HMD such as a headset, helmet, goggles,or glasses that may be worn by a user. Device 2150 may include a display2156 component or subsystem that may implement any of various types ofvirtual or augmented reality display technologies. For example, an HMDdevice 2150 may be a near-eye system that displays left and right imageson screens in front of the user's eyes that are viewed by a subject,such as DLP (digital light processing), LCD (liquid crystal display) andLCoS (liquid crystal on silicon) technology VR systems. As anotherexample, an HMD device 2150 may be a direct retinal projector systemthat scans left and right images, pixel by pixel, to the subject's eyes.To scan the images, left and right projectors generate beams that aredirected to left and right reflective components (e.g., ellipsoidmirrors) located in front of the user's eyes; the reflective componentsreflect the beams to the user's eyes. To create a three-dimensional (3D)effect, virtual content at different depths or distances in the 3Dvirtual view are shifted left or right in the two images as a functionof the triangulation of distance, with nearer objects shifted more thanmore distant objects.

Device 2150 may also include a controller 2154 configured to implementdevice-side functionality of the VR/MR system 2000 as described herein.In some embodiments, device 2150 may also include memory 2170 configuredto store software (code 2172) of the device component of the VR/MRsystem 2000 that is executable by the controller 2154, as well as data2174 that may be used by the software when executing on the controller2154. In various embodiments, the controller 2154 may be a uniprocessorsystem including one processor, or a multiprocessor system includingseveral processors (e.g., two, four, eight, or another suitable number).The controller 2154 may include central processing units (CPUs)configured to implement any suitable instruction set architecture, andmay be configured to execute instructions defined in that instructionset architecture. For example, in various embodiments the controller2154 may include general-purpose or embedded processors implementing anyof a variety of instruction set architectures (ISAs), such as the x86,PowerPC, SPARC, RISC, or MIPS ISAs, or any other suitable ISA. Inmultiprocessor systems, each of the processors may commonly, but notnecessarily, implement the same ISA. The controller 2154 may employ anymicroarchitecture, including scalar, superscalar, pipelined,superpipelined, out of order, in order, speculative, non-speculative,etc., or combinations thereof. The controller 2154 may include circuitryto implement microcoding techniques. The controller 2154 may include oneor more processing cores each configured to execute instructions. Thecontroller 2154 may include one or more levels of caches, which mayemploy any size and any configuration (set associative, direct mapped,etc.). In some embodiments, the controller 2154 may include at least onegraphics processing unit (GPU), which may include any suitable graphicsprocessing circuitry. Generally, a GPU may be configured to renderobjects to be displayed into a frame buffer (e.g., one that includespixel data for an entire frame). A GPU may include one or more graphicsprocessors that may execute graphics software to perform a part or allof the graphics operation, or hardware acceleration of certain graphicsoperations. In some embodiments, the controller 2154 may include one ormore other components for processing and rendering video and/or images,for example image signal processors (ISPs), encoder/decoders (codecs),etc. In some embodiments, controller 2154 may include at least onesystem on a chip (SOC).

The memory 2170 may include any type of memory, such as dynamic randomaccess memory (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double data rate (DDR,DDR2, DDR3, etc.) SDRAM (including mobile versions of the SDRAMs such asmDDR3, etc., or low power versions of the SDRAMs such as LPDDR2, etc.),RAMBUS DRAM (RDRAM), static RAM (SRAM), etc. In some embodiments, one ormore memory devices may be coupled onto a circuit board to form memorymodules such as single inline memory modules (SIMMs), dual inline memorymodules (DIMMs), etc. Alternatively, the devices may be mounted with anintegrated circuit implementing system in a chip-on-chip configuration,a package-on-package configuration, or a multi-chip moduleconfiguration.

In some embodiments, sensors 2160 may include, but are not limited to,one or more gaze tracking sensors (e.g., IR cameras with an IRillumination source) that may be used to track position and movement ofthe user's eyes. In some embodiments, there may be two gaze trackingsensors, with each gaze tracking sensor tracking a respective eye. Insome embodiments, the information collected by the gaze tracking sensorsmay be used to adjust the rendering of images by the base station 2100,and/or to adjust the projection of the images by the projection systemof the device 2150, based on the direction and angle at which the user'seyes are looking. For example, in some embodiments, content of theimages in a region around the location at which the user's eyes arecurrently looking may be rendered with more detail and at a higherresolution than content in regions at which the user is not looking,which allows available processing time for image data to be spent oncontent viewed by the foveal regions of the eyes rather than on contentviewed by the peripheral regions of the eyes. Similarly, content ofimages in regions at which the user is not looking may be compressedmore than content of the region around the point at which the user iscurrently looking. In some embodiments there may be two gaze trackingsensors located on an inner surface of the device 2150 at positions suchthat the sensors have views of respective ones of the user's eyes.However, in various embodiments, more or fewer gaze tracking sensors maybe used, and gaze tracking sensors may be positioned at other locations.In an example non-limiting embodiment, each gaze tracking sensor mayinclude an IR light source and IR camera, for example a 400×400 pixelcount camera with a frame rate of 120 FPS or greater, HFOV of 70degrees, and with a working distance of 10 millimeters (mm) to 80 mm.

In some embodiments, the device 2150 may include at least oneinertial-measurement unit (IMU) 2162 configured to detect position,orientation, and/or motion of the device 2150, and to provide thedetected position, orientation, and/or motion data to the controller2154 of the device 2150 and/or to the base station 2100.

Device 2150 may also include a wireless interface 2152 configured tocommunicate with an external base station 2100 via a wireless connection2180 to send sensor inputs to the base station 2100 and to receivecompressed rendered frames, strips, or tiles from the base station 2100.Various commercial (e.g., Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc.) or proprietarywireless communications technologies may be used in embodiments.

The base station 2100 may be an external device (e.g., a computingsystem, game console, etc.) that is communicatively coupled to device2150 via a wireless interface 2180. The base station 2100 may includeone or more of various types of processors (e.g., SOCs, CPUs, ISPs,GPUs, codecs, and/or other components) for rendering, filtering,encoding, and transmitting video and/or images. The base station 2100may render frames (each frame including a left and right image) thatinclude virtual content based at least in part on the various inputsobtained from the sensors 2160 via the wireless connection 2180, filterand compress the rendered frames (or strips of the frames) using a videoencoding system as described herein, and transmit the compressed framesor strips to the device 2150 for display.

Base station 2100 may be or may include any type of computing system orcomputing device, such as a desktop computer, notebook or laptopcomputer, pad or tablet device, smartphone, hand-held computing device,game controller, game system, and so on. Base station 2100 may include acontroller 2110 comprising one or more processors that implementbase-side functionality of the VR/MR system 2000 including the videoencoding system as described herein. Base station 2100 may also includememory 2120 configured to store software (code 2122) of the base stationcomponent of the VR/MR system 2000 that is executable by the basestation controller 2110, as well as data 2124 that may be used by thesoftware when executing on the controller 2110.

In various embodiments, the base station controller 2110 may be auniprocessor system including one processor, or a multiprocessor systemincluding several processors (e.g., two, four, eight, or anothersuitable number). The controller 2110 may include central processingunits (CPUs) configured to implement any suitable instruction setarchitecture and may be configured to execute instructions defined inthat instruction set architecture. For example, in various embodimentsthe controller 2110 may include general-purpose or embedded processorsimplementing any of a variety of instruction set architectures (ISAs),such as the x86, PowerPC, SPARC, RISC, or MIPS ISAs, or any othersuitable ISA. In multiprocessor systems, each of the processors maycommonly, but not necessarily, implement the same ISA. The controller2110 may employ any microarchitecture, including scalar, superscalar,pipelined, superpipelined, out of order, in order, speculative,non-speculative, etc., or combinations thereof. Controller 2110 mayinclude circuitry to implement microcoding techniques. The controller2110 may include one or more processing cores each configured to executeinstructions. The controller 2110 may include one or more levels ofcaches, which may employ any size and any configuration (setassociative, direct mapped, etc.). In some embodiments, the controller2110 may include at least one graphics processing unit (GPU), which mayinclude any suitable graphics processing circuitry. Generally, a GPU maybe configured to render objects to be displayed into a frame buffer(e.g., one that includes pixel data for an entire frame). A GPU mayinclude one or more graphics processors that may execute graphicssoftware to perform a part or all of the graphics operation, or hardwareacceleration of certain graphics operations. In some embodiments, thecontroller 2110 may include one or more other components for processing,rendering, filtering, and encoding video and/or images as describedherein, for example one or more of various types of integrated circuits(ICs), image signal processors (ISPs), encoder/decoders (codecs), etc.In some embodiments, the controller 2110 may include at least one systemon a chip (SOC).

The base station memory 2120 may include any type of memory, such asdynamic random access memory (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), doubledata rate (DDR, DDR2, DDR3, etc.) SDRAM (including mobile versions ofthe SDRAMs such as mDDR3, etc., or low power versions of the SDRAMs suchas LPDDR2, etc.), RAMBUS DRAM (RDRAM), static RAM (SRAM), etc. In someembodiments, one or more memory devices may be coupled onto a circuitboard to form memory modules such as single inline memory modules(SIMMs), dual inline memory modules (DIMMs), etc. Alternatively, thedevices may be mounted with an integrated circuit implementing system ina chip-on-chip configuration, a package-on-package configuration, or amulti-chip module configuration.

Base station 2100 may also include one or more wireless technologyinterfaces 2130 configured to communicate with device 2150 via awireless connection 2180 to receive sensor inputs from the device 2150and send compressed frames, strips, or tiles from the base station 2100to the device 2150. In some embodiments, the wireless technologyinterfaces 2130 may support multiple devices 2150 communicating with thebase station 2100 at the same time to thus enable multiple users to usethe system 2000 at the same time in a co-located environment. Variouscommercial (e.g., Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc.) or proprietary wirelesscommunications technologies may be used in embodiments.

In some embodiments, the base station 2100 may be configured to renderand transmit frames to the device 2150 to provide a 3D virtual view forthe user based at least in part on sensor 2160 inputs received from thedevice 2150. In some embodiments, the virtual view may includerenderings of the user's environment, including renderings of realobjects in the user's environment, based on video captured by one ormore scene cameras (e.g., RGB (visible light) video cameras) thatcapture high-quality, high-resolution video of the user's environment inreal time for display. In some embodiments, the virtual view may alsoinclude virtual content (e.g., virtual objects, virtual tags for realobjects, avatars of the user, etc.) rendered and composited with theprojected 3D view of the user's real environment by the base station2100.

While not shown in FIGS. 14 and 15 , in some embodiments the VR/MRsystem 2000 may include one or more other components. For example, thesystem may include a cursor control device (e.g., mouse) for moving avirtual cursor in the 3D virtual view to interact with virtual content.While FIGS. 14 and 15 show a single device 2150, in some embodiments theVR/MR system 2000 may support multiple devices 2150 communicating withthe base station 2100 at the same time to thus enable multiple users touse the system at the same time in a co-located environment.

The methods described herein may be implemented in software, hardware,or a combination thereof, in different embodiments. In addition, theorder of the blocks of the methods may be changed, and various elementsmay be added, reordered, combined, omitted, modified, etc. Variousmodifications and changes may be made as would be obvious to a personskilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure. The variousembodiments described herein are meant to be illustrative and notlimiting. Many variations, modifications, additions, and improvementsare possible. Accordingly, plural instances may be provided forcomponents described herein as a single instance. Boundaries betweenvarious components, operations and data stores are somewhat arbitrary,and particular operations are illustrated in the context of specificillustrative configurations. Other allocations of functionality areenvisioned and may fall within the scope of claims that follow. Finally,structures and functionality presented as discrete components in theexample configurations may be implemented as a combined structure orcomponent. These and other variations, modifications, additions, andimprovements may fall within the scope of embodiments as defined in theclaims that follow.

What is claimed is:
 1. An encoding system, comprising: a wavelettransform component comprising one or more processors configured togenerate, from input blocks, wavelet blocks comprising a plurality ofsubblocks, wherein each subblock includes data for one of a plurality ofwavelet subbands; a rate control component comprising one or moreprocessors configured to determine quantization parameters (QPs) for thesubblocks of the wavelet blocks; and an encoding pipeline comprising oneor more processors configured to encode each subblock of the waveletblocks using respective QPs generated by the rate control component togenerate compressed subblocks; and generate distortion estimates for thesubblocks; wherein the QPs for the subblocks of the wavelet blocks aredetermined by the rate control component based at least in part onstored rate control statistics for co-located blocks in previous frames,wherein the rate control statistics include rate-distortion curves forsubblocks of the co-located blocks that were determined based at leastin part on the distortion estimates for the subblocks of the co-locatedblocks and the QPs for the subblocks of the co-located blocks that weredetermined based at least in part on the rate-distortion curves for thesubblocks of the co-located blocks.
 2. The encoding system as recited inclaim 1, wherein the rate control component is further configured to:for each subblock of a wavelet block: generate a rate curve for thesubblock based on a histogram of unquantized discrete cosine transform(DCT) coefficients for the subblock and bit count statistics for thesubblock; generate a distortion curve based on the histogram ofunquantized DCT coefficients and the distortion estimate for thesubblock; and generate a rate-distortion curve based on the rate curveand the distortion curve for the subblock; estimate optimal QPs for thesubblocks of the wavelet block based on the rate-distortion curves forthe subblocks and a rate bound for the wavelet block, wherein the ratebound indicates a number of bits allocated to the wavelet block; andstore at least the rate-distortion curves and the optimal QPs as ratecontrol statistics for the wavelet block.
 3. The encoding system asrecited in claim 2, wherein, to estimate optimal QPs for the subblocksof the wavelet block based on the rate-distortion curves for thesubblocks and a rate bound for the wavelet block, a bisection search isapplied to the rate-distortion curves to find a point on eachrate-distortion curve with a same slope, wherein QPs associated with thepoints are selected as the optimal QPs for the respective subblocks ofthe wavelet block.
 4. The encoding system as recited in claim 1,wherein, to generate a distortion estimate for a subblock, a weight maskfor the subband represented in the subblock is applied to the subblockand a reconstruction of the compressed subblock to estimate a meansquare error (MSE) for the subblock.
 5. The encoding system as recitedin claim 1, wherein the wavelet transform component implements abiorthogonal wavelet transform that decomposes pixel blocks into sevensubbands (LLLL, LLLH, LLHL, LLHH, LH, HL, and HH).
 6. The encodingsystem as recited in claim 1, wherein the wavelet transform componentimplements an n-level wavelet transform that decomposes pixel blocksinto 3n+1 subbands.
 7. The encoding system as recited in claim 1,wherein the encoding pipeline implements an HEVC (high-efficiency videocoding) technique to encode the subblocks.
 8. The encoding system asrecited in claim 1, further comprising a wireless interface configuredto transmit the compressed subblocks over a wireless connection to areceiving device.
 9. A method, comprising: performing, by one or moreprocessors: applying a wavelet transform to an input block to decomposethe input block into a plurality of subbands; generating a wavelet blockcomprising a plurality of subblocks, wherein each subblock includesfrequency data for one of the subbands; determining quantizationparameters (QPs) for the subblocks of the wavelet block; and for eachsubblock of the wavelet block: applying an encoding technique to thesubblock using a respective QP to generate a compressed subblock; andgenerating a distortion estimate for the subblock; wherein determiningquantization parameters (QPs) for the subblocks of the wavelet blockcomprises determining the QPs for the subblocks of the wavelet blockfrom stored rate control statistics for a co-located block in a previousframe, wherein the rate control statistics include rate-distortioncurves for subblocks of the co-located block that were determined basedat least in part on distortion estimates for the subblocks of theco-located block and QPs for the subblocks of the co-located block thatwere determined based at least in part on the rate-distortion curves forthe subblocks of the co-located block.
 10. The method as recited inclaim 9, further comprising: for each subblock of the wavelet block:generating a rate curve for the subblock based on a histogram ofunquantized discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficients for thesubblock and bit count statistics for the subblock; generating adistortion curve based on the histogram of unquantized DCT coefficientsand the distortion estimate for the subblock; and generating arate-distortion curve based on the rate curve and the distortion curvefor the subblock; estimating optimal QPs for the subblocks of thewavelet block based on the rate-distortion curves for the subblocks anda rate bound for the wavelet block; and storing at least therate-distortion curves and the optimal QPs as rate control statisticsfor the wavelet block.
 11. The method as recited in claim 10, whereinestimating optimal QPs for the subblocks of the wavelet block based onthe rate-distortion curves for the subblocks and a rate bound for thewavelet block comprises applying a bisection search to therate-distortion curves to find a point on each rate-distortion curvewith a same slope, wherein QPs associated with the points are selectedas the optimal QPs for the respective subblocks of the wavelet block.12. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the wavelet transformcomponent implements an n-level wavelet transform that decomposes pixelblocks into 3n+1 subbands.
 13. The method as recited in claim 9, whereingenerating a distortion estimate for the subblock comprises applying aweight mask for the subband represented in the subblock to the subblockand a reconstruction of the compressed subblock to estimate a meansquare error (MSE) for the subblock.
 14. The method as recited in claim9, further comprising transmitting the compressed subblocks over awireless connection to a receiving device.
 15. A system, comprising: adevice comprising one or more processors and a display subsystem; and abase station comprising one or more processors configured to: apply awavelet transform to pixel blocks from a current video frame todecompose the pixel blocks into a plurality of subbands; for each pixelblock, generate a wavelet block comprising a plurality of subblocks,each subblock comprising data for one of the subbands; for each waveletblock: determine quantization parameters (QPs) for the subblocks of thewavelet block, wherein the QPs for the subblocks of the wavelet blockare determined based at least in part on stored rate control statisticsfor co-located blocks in one or more previous frames, wherein the ratecontrol statistics include rate-distortion curves for subblocks of theone or more co-located blocks that were determined based at least inpart on the distortion estimates for the subblocks of the one or moreco-located blocks and the QPs for the subblocks of the one or moreco-located blocks that were determined based at least in part on therate-distortion curves for the one or more subblocks of the co-locatedblocks; apply an encoding technique to each subblock of the waveletblock, wherein the encoding technique uses the determined QPs for thesubblocks of the wavelet block to generate compressed subblocks; andtransmit compressed wavelet blocks over a wireless connection to thedevice; wherein the one or more processors of the device are configuredto: decompress compressed wavelet blocks received from the base station;perform wavelet synthesis on the decompressed wavelet blocks toreconstruct the pixel data for the video frame; and provide thereconstructed pixel data to the display subsystem for display.
 16. Thesystem as recited in claim 15, wherein the one or more processors of thebase station are further configured to: generate encoding statisticsincluding a distortion estimate for each subblock of the wavelet block;generate rate control statistics for the wavelet block based at least inpart on the encoding statistics for the subblocks of the wavelet block;and store the rate control statistics for the wavelet block.
 17. Thesystem as recited in claim 16, wherein, to generate rate controlstatistics for the wavelet block based at least in part on the encodingstatistics for the subblocks of the wavelet block, the one or moreprocessors of the base station are further configured to: for eachsubblock of the wavelet block: generate a rate curve for the subblockbased on a histogram of unquantized discrete cosine transform (DCT)coefficients for the subblock and bit count statistics for the subblock;generate a distortion curve based on the histogram of unquantized DCTcoefficients and the distortion estimate for the subblock; and generatea rate-distortion curve based on the rate curve and the distortion curvefor the subblock; estimate optimal QPs for the subblocks of the waveletblock based on the rate-distortion curves for the subblocks and a ratebound for the wavelet block, wherein the rate bound indicates a numberof bits allocated to the wavelet block; and store at least therate-distortion curves and the optimal QPs as the rate controlstatistics for the wavelet block.
 18. The system as recited in claim 17,wherein, to estimate optimal QPs for the subblocks of the wavelet blockbased on the rate-distortion curves for the subblocks and a rate boundfor the wavelet block, a bisection search is applied to therate-distortion curves to find a point on each rate-distortion curvewith a same slope, wherein QPs associated with the points are selectedas the optimal QPs for the respective subblocks of the wavelet block.19. The system as recited in claim 16, wherein, to generate a distortionestimate for a subblock, a weight mask for the subband represented inthe subblock is applied to the subblock and a reconstruction of thecompressed subblock to estimate a mean square error (MSE) for thesubblock.
 20. The system as recited in claim 15, wherein the device is ahead-mounted device.